Rage: associations with compulsive buying

Sansone, Randy A.; Chang, Joy; Jewell, Bryan; Marion, Brandee E.

doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2011.06.003

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This measure was developed ad hoc for the purpose of this study and included 42 face-valid items regarding demographics and psychosocial history, such as history of abuse and neglect, psychiatric treatment, history of being bullied, aggression, and primary caregiver relationships. A very similar survey has been used in previous research by the third author on BPD in similar populations (e.g., Sansone, Chang, Jewell, & Marion, 2012;Sansone et al, 2013). In the current study, we evaluated the associations of abuse history (i.e., history of physical, emotional, or sexual abuse and physical neglect), history of treatment, history of aggression, quality of caregiver relationships (number of caregivers and caregiver ratings), and history of being victimized by bullies with BPD.…”

Section: Antisocial Behavior Questionnaire (Abq)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparing External Correlates ofDSM-5Section II and Section III Dimensional Trait Operationalizations of Borderline Personality Disorder

Anderson

Sellbom

Sansone

et al. 2016

Journal of Personality Disorders

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The current study evaluated the relative associations of the DSM-5 Section II operationalization of Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) and dimensional traits included in a diagnosis of BPD in DSM-5 Section III with conceptually relevant external criterion variables. It is important to determine whether or not Section II BPD and constellation of Section III BPD traits have similar positions in the nomological network representing the BPD construct. Moreover, it is important to determine whether or not the trait-based Section III BPD diagnosis is an improvement upon the categorical Section II diagnosis in regard to its associations with external criteria. To evaluate this, we used two samples, a patient sample consisting of 145 psychiatric patients and a university sample consisting of 399 undergraduate students. We conducted a series of correlation and regression analyses in order to determine the relative associations of these two diagnostic methodologies with relevant external criteria. Correlation analyses did not favor either model, but indicated that both Section II and Section III BPD have associations with external criterion variables relevant to BPD. The regression analyses tended to favor the trait-based Section III model, supporting the construct validity and use of the trait profile for BPD in DSM-5 Section III. Generally, it was concluded that the Section II and Section III operationalizations have similar positions in a nomological network representing the BPD construct.Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is a serious personality dysfunction characterized by symptoms such as affective instability, difficulties in interpersonal relationships, impulsivity, fear of abandonment, identity confusion, and risk for suicidal behaviors (American Psychiatric Association [APA], 2013). Prevalence rates for this disorder are high and estimated to be between 2-6% in the general population, 10% in outpatient mental health settings, and

show abstract

Section: Antisocial Behavior Questionnaire (Abq)mentioning

confidence: 99%