2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2020.123327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RAFT polymerization within high internal phase emulsions: Porous structures, mechanical behaviors, and uptakes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of the RAFT agent in the eutectic phase was critical for ensuring void connectivity and uniformity. In the absence of a RAFT agent, the o/e monolith structure prepared by uncontrolled free-radical polymerization was highly irregular and typically possessed a closed-cell morphology (Figure S8); these results are in line with that of Benaddi and co-workers who reported that RAFT polymerization in the continuous phase of a w/o HIPE “locks in” the porous, open-cell structure in contrast to free radical polymerization . The inclusion of a RAFT CTA within the continuous phase also influences mechanical properties of the polyHIPEs in addition to morphology (see next section for expanded discussion), which is related to the differences between free-radical and controlled-radical polymerization.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The presence of the RAFT agent in the eutectic phase was critical for ensuring void connectivity and uniformity. In the absence of a RAFT agent, the o/e monolith structure prepared by uncontrolled free-radical polymerization was highly irregular and typically possessed a closed-cell morphology (Figure S8); these results are in line with that of Benaddi and co-workers who reported that RAFT polymerization in the continuous phase of a w/o HIPE “locks in” the porous, open-cell structure in contrast to free radical polymerization . The inclusion of a RAFT CTA within the continuous phase also influences mechanical properties of the polyHIPEs in addition to morphology (see next section for expanded discussion), which is related to the differences between free-radical and controlled-radical polymerization.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Both the chemical variety and the high porosity variety enable the formation of materials for specific applications, for instance, water clean-up [ 19 ], absorption and adsorption [ 20 , 21 ], separation processes [ 22 , 23 ], controlled release matrices [ 24 ] and tissue engineering [ 25 ]. Another aspect that makes polyHIPEs attractive is the available polymerisation techniques, such as atom transfer radical polymerisation (ATRP) [ 26 ], free-radical polymerisation (FRP) [ 27 ], reversible-addition-fragmentation chain-transfer (RAFT) [ 28 ], ring opening metathesis polymerisation (ROMP) [ 29 ] and click polymerisation [ 30 ], to name a few. In addition to building blocks, another property that can be freely controlled is the morphology of the prepared polyHIPEs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides simplicity, these methods are versatile with respect to further functionalization via surface grafting from the retained initiator or transfer agent functionality within porous scaffolds. In flow applications, the presence of functionality on the pore surface is highly desirable as the liquid is transported through the continuous porous network. RAFT polymerization has been previously utilized for the preparation of monolithic polymers within liquid chromatography columns, and further grafting of functional groups on the surface has been demonstrated .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%