2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.04.22.054866
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RADSex: a computational workflow to study sex determination using Restriction Site-Associated DNA Sequencing data

Abstract: The study of sex determination and sex chromosome organisation in non-model species has long been technically challenging, but new sequencing methodologies are now enabling precise and high-throughput identification of sex-specific genomic sequences. In particular, Restriction Site-Associated DNA Sequencing (RAD-Seq) is being extensively applied to explore sex determination systems in many plant and animal species. However, software designed to specifically search for sex-biased markers using RAD-Seq data is l… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
40
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
(54 reference statements)
4
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Raw RAD-seq reads were demultiplexed with the process_radtags.pl script from stacks version 1.44 ( Catchen et al, 2013 ) with all parameters set to default. Demultiplexed reads for each species were analyzed with the RADSex computational workflow ( Feron et al, 2020a ) using the radsex software version 1.1.2 (10.5281/zenodo.3775206). After generating a table of markers depth with process , the distribution of markers between sexes was computed with distrib and markers significantly associated with phenotypic sex were extracted with signif using a minimum depth of 10 (−d 10) for both commands and with all other settings at the default.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raw RAD-seq reads were demultiplexed with the process_radtags.pl script from stacks version 1.44 ( Catchen et al, 2013 ) with all parameters set to default. Demultiplexed reads for each species were analyzed with the RADSex computational workflow ( Feron et al, 2020a ) using the radsex software version 1.1.2 (10.5281/zenodo.3775206). After generating a table of markers depth with process , the distribution of markers between sexes was computed with distrib and markers significantly associated with phenotypic sex were extracted with signif using a minimum depth of 10 (−d 10) for both commands and with all other settings at the default.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, sex determination in bow n is either polyfactorial, too small to be detected using Pool-Seq, and/or based on environmental effects. Notably, no genomic sex differentiation loci have been found using similar approaches for both spotted gar 38 and the more distantly related sterlet sturgeon 39 . Genetic sex determination mechanisms thus remain elusive for nonteleost ray-nned shes, if they exist.…”
Section: Sex Determination In Bow Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RNA was extracted from each individual tissue (Qiagen RNEasy kit), quanti ed (ThermoFisher NanoDrop and Agilent BioAnalzyer), and pooled in equal amounts prior to library barcoding. Sequencing reads from NovaSeq 6000 were quality-trimmed using Trimmomatic v0 38.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial analysis of sex-associated markers in the creek chub genome was performed using RADSex, a computational workflow intended as an "all-in-one" GSD detection program and visualizer, with the assistance of the RStudio package sgtr (Feron et al 2021). RADSex treats all markers as unassociated genotypes, rather than alleles of the marker, and searches for markers that are found in one sex exclusively, at a statistically significant level (Feron et al 2021). Thus, it is theoretically able to detect heteromorphic or homomorphic sex chromosomes, or polygenic sex determination loci, using only one workflow.…”
Section: Primary Investigation Of All Gsd Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%