2017
DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2017.1336426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radon and uranium concentrations in drinking water sources along the fault line passing through Reasi district, lesser Himalayas of Jammu and Kashmir State, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the recorded radon concentrations were compared with the European Commission (EU 2001) recommended action level of 100 Bq/L for pubic water supplies; and it was apparent that radon concentration exceeded the action level in 20% of samples (viz., 13 groundwater samples). The mean and the range values of radon concentration recorded in the present study are on higher side compared to the result reported by Kumar et al (2017) Prasad et al (2009) as the latter reported radon concentration ranging from 8-3047 (average: 510 Bq/L) in the groundwater collected and analyzed from parts of Garhwal Himalayas, India. Figure 3 and it well fits to a typical log-normal distributions.…”
Section: Distribution Of Radon Concentrationcontrasting
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly, the recorded radon concentrations were compared with the European Commission (EU 2001) recommended action level of 100 Bq/L for pubic water supplies; and it was apparent that radon concentration exceeded the action level in 20% of samples (viz., 13 groundwater samples). The mean and the range values of radon concentration recorded in the present study are on higher side compared to the result reported by Kumar et al (2017) Prasad et al (2009) as the latter reported radon concentration ranging from 8-3047 (average: 510 Bq/L) in the groundwater collected and analyzed from parts of Garhwal Himalayas, India. Figure 3 and it well fits to a typical log-normal distributions.…”
Section: Distribution Of Radon Concentrationcontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…A wide range of variation in the radon concentration level is subject to origin of water source. Thus, it is very essential to assess the presence of this radionuclide in different water sources, particularly underground sources (Fonollosa, et al 2016) in order to protect the population from consequence of excessive internal radiation exposure from 222 Rn (Kumar et al 2017). Many researchers (Binesh et al 2010(Binesh et al & 2011Fakhri et al 2016;Somlai et al 2007) have recorded significant differences between the effective dose received by infants, children, and adult men and women by using higher conversion factor for infants and children and lower dose conversion factor (DCF) for adults according to their radio-sensitivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The activity concentrations of 222 Rn and 220 Rn in some dwellings of study area were also measured by Smart RnDuo monitor (active technique). The advanced SMART RnDuo (active technique) is manufactured by Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, India for the measurement of 222 Rn and 220 Rn concentration in air, water, and soil [45,46]. The observed concentrations of radon 222 Rn and 220 Rn by smart RnDuo monitor are found to be in fare agreement with passive dosimetry (pinhole dosimeter) as given in Table 6.…”
Section: Comparison Of Active and Passive Techniquementioning
confidence: 85%
“…Radon concentration in the underground water in this study was determined by using RAD H 2 O was used. 15 A watt-250 protocol along with Grab mode was chosen on the RAD-7 for 250 ml samples. The internal pump was used to obtain radon from the water sample and it circulates the gas to the counter for measurement.…”
Section: Sample Collection and Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%