2019
DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30410-3
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiotherapy versus transoral robotic surgery and neck dissection for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (ORATOR): an open-label, phase 2, randomised trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
309
4
18

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 336 publications
(356 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
17
309
4
18
Order By: Relevance
“…QOL analysis for secondary endpoints will be performed in the same way as the ORATOR trial using linear mixed-effects models [24]. The original ORATOR trial will be used for additional historical controls [12]. A comparison will occur between HPV+ patients in ORATOR (who were treated with more aggressive approaches) and ORATOR2 to assess differences in QOL and time-to-event outcomes.…”
Section: Analysis Planmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…QOL analysis for secondary endpoints will be performed in the same way as the ORATOR trial using linear mixed-effects models [24]. The original ORATOR trial will be used for additional historical controls [12]. A comparison will occur between HPV+ patients in ORATOR (who were treated with more aggressive approaches) and ORATOR2 to assess differences in QOL and time-to-event outcomes.…”
Section: Analysis Planmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ORATOR trial is the only trial to examine the question of a primary RT vs. primary TOS approach in a randomized fashion [12]. This phase II trial included 68 patients with OPC regardless of HPV status, and randomized patients to RT (70 Gy, with chemotherapy if N1-2) or TOS plus neck dissection (with or without adjuvant RT/CRT, based on pathology).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Functional outcomes were not reported in the current study, but data currently are being collected. In what to our knowledge is the only randomized trial comparing TORS versus primary RT and/or chemoradiation for patients with OPSCC, similar survival outcomes were demonstrated but with a superior swallowing quality‐of‐life score at 1 year that favored nonsurgical treatment, although the difference in the score was below the threshold of a clinically meaningful change. The median follow‐up in the current study was >3 years, but it will be prudent to again analyze these data when a longer follow‐up interval exists for all patients because late recurrences are more common in HPV‐positive patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Organs at Risk (OAR) de nitions, dose constraints and planning priorities are adapted from the following protocols: RTOG protocols 1016 36 (Arm 1) and RTOG 0920 37 (Arm 2), NCIC-CTG HN6, ORATOR 38,39 and ORATOR2 40 , and are described in Appendix 1.…”
Section: Radiotherapy Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%