2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4119-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiotherapy related skin toxicity (RAREST-01): Mepitel® film versus standard care in patients with locally advanced head-and-neck cancer

Abstract: BackgroundThe aim of the present trial is to investigate a new option of skin protection in order to reduce the rate of grade ≥ 2 skin toxicity in patients receiving radiotherapy alone or radiochemotherapy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head-and-neck (SCCHN).Methods / DesignThis is a randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group multi-center trial that compares the following treatments of radiation dermatitis in patients with head-and-neck cancer: Mepitel® Film (Arm A) vs. standard care (A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Grade ≥2 dermatitis and grade ≥2 mucositis rates were very high in previous studies (86-92% and 86-100%, respectively) and require improvement [4][5][6]. In the previous RAREST-01 trial that compared the dressing Mepitel® Film to standard skin care in patients irradiated for head-and-neck cancer, dermatitis rates were lower than expected in both groups [7,8].…”
Section: Introduction Background and Rationale {6a}mentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Grade ≥2 dermatitis and grade ≥2 mucositis rates were very high in previous studies (86-92% and 86-100%, respectively) and require improvement [4][5][6]. In the previous RAREST-01 trial that compared the dressing Mepitel® Film to standard skin care in patients irradiated for head-and-neck cancer, dermatitis rates were lower than expected in both groups [7,8].…”
Section: Introduction Background and Rationale {6a}mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Since the administration of an absorbent, self-adhesive dressing appeared a promising approach to reduce radiation dermatitis, we performed a randomized trial (RAREST-01) that compared the new dressing Mepitel® Film to standard skin care with respect to radiation dermatitis rates [7,8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These patients are generally treated with surgery of the primary tumor and lymph nodes followed by radiotherapy plus/minus chemotherapy or with definitive radio-chemotherapy alone (2)(3)(4)(5)(6). These multimodal treatments are often associated with significant toxicities and functional restrictions (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(26)(27)(28). The most common acute toxicities that are related to radiotherapy and radio-chemotherapy include dermatitis and oral mucositis (2)(3)(4)(5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If interruptions of the radiotherapy course are required or the concurrent chemotherapy cannot be administered with the complete planned dose, the patients' prognoses become worse (29,30). Xerostomia is a significant late morbidity that can be a consequence of surgical resection of one or both parotid glands and/or radio(chemo)therapy (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31). This type of late toxicity can significantly impair the patients' quality of life and lead to other late morbidities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidently a need to carry out tests confirming the effectiveness of individual intervention. In 2018 a randomized Radiotherapy Related Skin Toxicity (RAREST-01) study commenced [26]. It compares standard care and Mepitel Film (gentle, transparent, breathable dressings) in patients with locally advanced squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck receiving radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy [26].…”
Section: Prevention and Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%