Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1975
DOI: 10.1288/00005537-197510000-00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiotherapy in the treatment of T3‐T4 supraglottic tumors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…24 Table 4 summarizes selected outcomes of RT whether in the postoperative or the definitive setting for the treatment of patients with T4 laryngeal cancer as reported in the literature. 18,22,23,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] Despite advances in imaging, radiation planning and delivery, and combining chemotherapy with RT, nonsurgical LP efforts must be evaluated carefully within the context of functional integrity and disease control. Issues to be considered include freedom from aspiration (which to our knowledge is rarely evaluated or reported in the literature), the need for tracheostomy and feeding tubes or dietary modifications, voice intelligibility, the potential for salvage surgery for failures after RT, and locoregional RFS compared with initial laryngectomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 Table 4 summarizes selected outcomes of RT whether in the postoperative or the definitive setting for the treatment of patients with T4 laryngeal cancer as reported in the literature. 18,22,23,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] Despite advances in imaging, radiation planning and delivery, and combining chemotherapy with RT, nonsurgical LP efforts must be evaluated carefully within the context of functional integrity and disease control. Issues to be considered include freedom from aspiration (which to our knowledge is rarely evaluated or reported in the literature), the need for tracheostomy and feeding tubes or dietary modifications, voice intelligibility, the potential for salvage surgery for failures after RT, and locoregional RFS compared with initial laryngectomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%