Radiothérapie guidée par l’image avec le Cone Beam CT kV (Elekta™) : expérience du centre Léon-Bérard

Pommier, P.; Gassa, F.; Lafay, F; Claude, L.

doi:10.1016/j.canrad.2009.05.004

Cited by 12 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…MRI has shown its clinical value in radiation therapy due to its higher soft tissue contrast that allows better localization of tumor without additional radiation exposure to patient. Pre-treatment and on-board MRI allows for online verification and adjustment of treatment plan, which consequently improves the accuracy and safety of treatment in radiotherapy ( 2 - 4 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

On-board MRI image compression using video encoder for MR-guided radiotherapy

Shang¹,

Huang²,

Zhang³

et al. 2023

Quant Imaging Med Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is currently used for online target monitoring and plan adaptation in modern image-guided radiotherapy. However, storing a large amount of data accumulated during patient treatment becomes an issue. In this study, the feasibility to compress MRI images accumulated in MR-guided radiotherapy using video encoders was investigated. Methods Two sorting algorithms were employed to reorder the slices in multiple MRI sets for the input sequence of video encoder. Three cropping algorithms were used to auto-segment regions of interest for separate data storage. Four video encoders, motion-JPEG (M-JPEG), MPEG-4 (MP4), Advanced Video Coding (AVC or H.264) and High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC or H.265) were investigated. The compression performance of video encoders was evaluated by compression ratio and time, while the restoration accuracy of video encoders was evaluated by mean square error (MSE), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), and video quality matrix (VQM). The performances of all combinations of video encoders, sorting methods, and cropping algorithms were investigated and their effects were statistically analyzed. Results The compression ratios of MP4, H.264 and H.265 with both sorting methods were improved by 26% and 5%, 42% and 27%, 72% and 43%, respectively, comparing to those of M-JPEG. The slice-prioritized sorting method showed a higher compression ratio than that of the location-prioritized sorting method for MP4 (P=0.00000), H.264 (P=0.00012) and H.265 (P=0.00000), respectively. The compression ratios of H.265 were improved significantly with the applications of morphology algorithm (P=0.01890 and P=0.00530), flood-fill algorithm (P=0.00510 and P=0.00020) and level-set algorithm (P=0.02800 and P=0.00830) for both sorting methods. Among the four video encoders, H.265 showed the best compression ratio and restoration accuracy. Conclusions The compression ratio and restoration accuracy of video encoders using inter-frame coding (MP4, H.264 and H.265) were higher than that of video encoders using intra-frame coding (M-JPEG). It is feasible to implement video encoders using inter-frame coding for high-performance MRI data storage in MR-guided radiotherapy.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%