2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiosurgery for Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations in Elderly Patients: Effect of Advanced Age on Outcomes After Intervention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As data on AVM treatment outcomes accumulate, our understanding of the indications for an intervention has evolved concurrently. [18][19][20][21] A pervasive sentiment remains that invasive therapy is justified for ruptured AVMs because of their greater hemorrhage risk compared with unruptured AVMs. 22,23,44,60 However, the manner in which SM Grade III AVMs are managed, as well as the associated outcomes, varies significantly among different institutions.…”
Section: Indications For Intervention and Treatment Outcomes For Sm Gmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As data on AVM treatment outcomes accumulate, our understanding of the indications for an intervention has evolved concurrently. [18][19][20][21] A pervasive sentiment remains that invasive therapy is justified for ruptured AVMs because of their greater hemorrhage risk compared with unruptured AVMs. 22,23,44,60 However, the manner in which SM Grade III AVMs are managed, as well as the associated outcomes, varies significantly among different institutions.…”
Section: Indications For Intervention and Treatment Outcomes For Sm Gmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[22][23][24][25] Radiosurgery is a minimally invasive modality for the treatment of AVMs, and it is especially favorable, relative to microsurgery, for small-to moderate-sized AVMs in eloquent or deep brain areas. [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42] The results of many previous radiosurgery series are confounded by the inclusion of patients who were previously treated with surgical resection, embolization, and fractionated radiation therapy. Thus, comparing the outcomes of these unfiltered studies to those of the interventional arm of ARUBA cannot lead to generalizable conclusions.…”
Section: February 2016mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The elevated risk of both initial and repeat hemorrhage for these deep-seated CCMs compared to cortical CCMs favors intervention, whereas the relatively high rate of neurological morbidity associated with surgical resection of these lesions supports a more conservative approach 41)42). Although radiosurgery is a conceptually attractive alternative to surgical resection of eloquent CCMs, the radiosurgery-induced complication rate is significantly higher for CCMs than for AVMs, and CCMs cannot be radiologically monitored for obliteration after radiosurgery 3)5)6)8)9)10)12)13)14)15)16)17)18)19)20)21)22)23)25)26)27)28)29)30)31)32)33)34)35)36)37)43)44)49)50)52)53)56)59)63)64)65)66)67)68). Instead, the proposed effect of radiosurgery on CCMs is a decreased risk of symptomatic hemorrhages, which is controversial due to temporal clustering of CCM hemorrhages 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%