2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-008-0003-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radionuclides and heavy metals in Borovac, Southern Serbia

Abstract: The collected data should provide a base for the health risk assessments on animals and humans in the near future. It should be emphasized that the sampling was carried out 5 years after the military action and that the number of samples was limited; therefore, the conclusions should be accepted only as observed tendencies and a detailed study should be recommended in the future.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
31
2
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(33 reference statements)
6
31
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the definition of the Enrichment Factor (EF), the proportional share of the study analyte relative to the reference element in lichens or mosses and soil points out to soil as the source of its enrichment, eg [22][23][24]. EF is used to compare, usually with reference to aluminium or scandium concentrations, relative concentrations of analytes accumulated in lichens or mosses and soil.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the definition of the Enrichment Factor (EF), the proportional share of the study analyte relative to the reference element in lichens or mosses and soil points out to soil as the source of its enrichment, eg [22][23][24]. EF is used to compare, usually with reference to aluminium or scandium concentrations, relative concentrations of analytes accumulated in lichens or mosses and soil.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean gross alpha and beta activities in the main course were found to be 0.095 and 0.21 Bq L −1 , respectively, being the main natural radionuclide contributions uranium, radium, and their alpha daughters for gross alpha activity, and 40 K and 226 Ra beta daughters for gross beta activity (Sanchez-Cabeza and Pujol 1998;Pujol and Sanchez-Cabeza 2000). The notable number of worldwide studies aimed at analyzing the levels of radioactivity in natural water bodies show a high variability of results, with gross alpha and beta activities ranging <0.008-0.782 and 0.021-0.816 Bq L −1 , respectively (i.e., Bozkurt et al 2007;Dueñas et al 2007;Forte et al 2007;Kücükömeroglu et al 2008;Popovic et al 2008;Selçuk Zorer et al 2009). The concentrations here reported for tap water from the Ebro River are generally in the lower range than those reported in the scientific literature.…”
Section: Radioactivity In Environmental Monitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of reliable ecotoxicological data due to rather conservative official monitoring programmes based on traditional set of physicochemical parameters stimulated the implementation of small to regional scale field ecotoxicological research projects that are based on (a) bioaccumulation studies, mostly on heavy metals in fish (Teodorović et al 2000) or mosses and lichen (Popović et al 2008) and PCBs in aquatic biota (Adamov et al 2003) and (b) conventional ecotoxicological tests, such as the study on chronic toxicity of the Sava River (water and sediment), based on algal bioassay (Kallqvist et al 2008). Sediment toxicity evaluations, undertaken as a part of feasibility studies for remediation activities on transboundary watercourses (Dalmacija et al 2006;Prica et al 2008), showed that although heavy metal concentrations were high, bioavailability and consequently toxicity to aquatic biota was low, due to the high content of clay, iron and sulphides ( Table 1).…”
Section: Ecotoxicology In Environmental Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%