2001
DOI: 10.2172/795697
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radionuclide Transport Models Under Ambient Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[45] Inputs to the leaching model also include data about Cl concentration, porosity, and saturation for stratigraphic units TCw, PTn, and TSw at Yucca Mountain (Tables 1 and 2). In our simulation of pore water, tortuosity was assigned the same values as porosity [Moridis and Hu, 2000;Farrell and Reinhard, 1994;Grathwohl, 1998]. Saturation in the matrix is used in calculating the concentration term to get the actual gradient after the rock chips have been soaked.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[45] Inputs to the leaching model also include data about Cl concentration, porosity, and saturation for stratigraphic units TCw, PTn, and TSw at Yucca Mountain (Tables 1 and 2). In our simulation of pore water, tortuosity was assigned the same values as porosity [Moridis and Hu, 2000;Farrell and Reinhard, 1994;Grathwohl, 1998]. Saturation in the matrix is used in calculating the concentration term to get the actual gradient after the rock chips have been soaked.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boving and Grathwohl (2001) compiled m values for different types of rocks and found that m is generally >2 in materials of low porosity (≤0.2). By comparing measured local‐scale matrix diffusion coefficients and the corresponding molecular diffusion–coefficient values in free water, Moridis and Hu (2000) concluded that m = 2 is a good approximation for the rock matrix in the unsaturated zone of Yucca Mountain. The laboratory data cited by Becker and Shapiro (2000) suggest that m = 2.93 (obtained using measured φ = 1.5%) is valid for the crystalline rock matrix under consideration.…”
Section: Data From Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an effort to incorporate this flow behavior into the continuum approach, Liu et al (1998) developed an AFM that assumes only a portion of fractures in a connected unsaturated fracture network contribute to liquid water flow. Because the AFM can provide a large range of flow behaviors in unsaturated fractures (including fast flow behavior), it has been used extensively for modeling large‐scale flow and transport in the unsaturated zone of Yucca Mountain (e.g., Moridis and Hu, 2000; Wu et al, 2000; Wu et al, 2002; Liu et al, 2003b; Zhou et al, 2003; Buscheck et al, 2002; Xu et al, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%