2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2020.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiomics Feature Analysis Using Native T1 Mapping for Discriminating Between Cardiac Tumors and Thrombi

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thrombi depict low T2 time as compared to both benign and malignant tumor. 20 This study shows 73.6% (28) thrombi and 62.5% (5) malignant tumors have T2 time less than 60ms and only 20% (2) benign lesions have less than 60ms T2 time. Majority of benign tumors show parametric T1 time ranging from 2000-2750ms, malignant tumors have T1 time in between 1450-1950ms whereas, thrombi lie within 600-1650ms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Thrombi depict low T2 time as compared to both benign and malignant tumor. 20 This study shows 73.6% (28) thrombi and 62.5% (5) malignant tumors have T2 time less than 60ms and only 20% (2) benign lesions have less than 60ms T2 time. Majority of benign tumors show parametric T1 time ranging from 2000-2750ms, malignant tumors have T1 time in between 1450-1950ms whereas, thrombi lie within 600-1650ms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Prior studies reported that radiomics might facilitate the prediction of the treatment response in several disease entities, such as hepatocellular carcinoma, pancreatic cancer, rectal cancer and gastric cancer [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ]. As for the application of radiomics in cardiology, the study conducted by Son et al [ 22 ] revealed that a native T1 radiomics model could differentiate thrombi from tumors better than the mean T1 value (AUC 0.98 vs. 0.86). Ma et al [ 28 ] reported that native T1 mapping-based radiomics showed superior performance for the diagnosis of microvascular obstruction compared to T1 values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ROIs were delineated by the senior radiologist (15 years of experience in CMR evaluation) in 30 randomly selected patients (20 cases in the effective group and 10 cases in the ineffective group) for evaluation of the inter-observer variability. Complex pre-processing steps such as normalization or inhomogeneity correction were unnecessary for T1 mapping images before radiomics analysis given that each pixel in the map represents the objective corresponding T1 values of the tissues under the same scanning conditions [ 21 , 22 ]. The software enables the automatic extraction of radiomics features from the segmented ROIs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the T2 values vary between sites and vendors [ 22 , 23 ]. On the other hand, many studies suggest radiomics as an interesting prospect to be studied regarding quantitative MRI images without these shortcomings aforementioned [ 24 ]. The superior performance of radiomics features to T2 values of cartilage in discerning ACLR patients and controls indicated that radiomics features showed higher sensitivity in assessing the degenerative changes of early-stage PTOA in knee cartilage after ACLR compared to the T2 values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%