2018
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiomics analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient in cervical cancer: A preliminary study on histological grade evaluation

Abstract: 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
65
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
65
1
Order By: Relevance
“…ICC values >0.4, >0.6, >0.8, and >0.9 were regarded as representing moderate, good, very good, and excellent reproducibility, respectively. 26 Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated for all patients who underwent curative operations for lung adenocarcinoma.…”
Section: Radiomic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ICC values >0.4, >0.6, >0.8, and >0.9 were regarded as representing moderate, good, very good, and excellent reproducibility, respectively. 26 Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated for all patients who underwent curative operations for lung adenocarcinoma.…”
Section: Radiomic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Invasive biopsy is the "gold standard" for pretreatment evaluation of histologic grade, but is often limited due to sample bias [17]. As a non-invasive approach for characterizing tumors comprehensively, ADC-based radiomics has demonstrated potential for prediction of the histologic grade of giloma [18], cervical cancer [19], and bladder cancer [20]. Therefore, we investigated the predictive ability of radiomics features from ADC maps for the histologic grade of SCCs of the tongue and MF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple 3D histopathological grading methods for different tissues have been proposed in the literature, based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [12][13][14][15] , optical imaging 16 , ultrasound 17 , and atomic force microscopy 18 . 3D grading methods could possibly serve as a reference for clinical 3D modalities, as well as higher resolution 3D techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%