2016
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016160845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiomic Profiling of Glioblastoma: Identifying an Imaging Predictor of Patient Survival with Improved Performance over Established Clinical and Radiologic Risk Models

Abstract: Purpose To evaluate whether radiomic feature-based magnetic resonance (MR) imaging signatures allow prediction of survival and stratification of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with improved accuracy compared with that of established clinical and radiologic risk models. Materials and Methods Retrospective evaluation of data was approved by the local ethics committee and informed consent was waived. A total of 119 patients (allocated in a 2:1 ratio to a discovery [n = 79] or validation [n = 40] set) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
238
0
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 341 publications
(261 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
17
238
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are consistent with the recently reported results in 38 , where the combination of clinical and radiomic features were found to improve prediction of GBM survival, as compared to radiomic features alone.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…These findings are consistent with the recently reported results in 38 , where the combination of clinical and radiomic features were found to improve prediction of GBM survival, as compared to radiomic features alone.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Although these studies are important, these approaches are generally expensive and require considerable development before clinical use. Some investigators have used radiomic features to distinguish radiation necrosis from tumor progression [10; 12; 3234], but those studies used radiomic features obtained at a single time point instead of using changes in radiomic features over time to model or classify features. Because radiomic features seem to keep changing over time, determining the best time to extract features for modeling is difficult, and models built on these features may not be sufficiently robust to account for variations over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ML holds also a great potential for dealing with "big data" generated by hybrid imaging methods [280]. For example, ML has been successfully applied in hybrid imaging to predict survival [283], treatment outcome [284], and tumor grading [285]. Furthermore, unsupervised ML allows the identification of breast cancer subtypes [286].…”
Section: Image-derived Prediction Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%