2023
DOI: 10.3390/app13042525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiometric Normalization Using a Pseudo−Invariant Polygon Features−Based Algorithm with Contemporaneous Sentinel−2A and Landsat−8 OLI Imagery

Abstract: As sensor parameters and atmospheric conditions create uncertainties for at−sensor radiation detection, radiometric consistency among satellite images is difficult to achieve. Relative radiometric normalization is a method that can improve multi−image consistency with accurate pseudo−invariant features (PIFs), especially over large areas or long time series satellite images. Although there are algorithms that manually or automatically select PIFs, the spatial mismatch of satellite images can affect PIF extract… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when dealing with image pairs that include significant land cover/land use (LULC) changes, these methods may introduce noise structures and artifacts to the final results because of their equal treatment of all the pixels. SRRN methods, however, are specifically designed to handle radiometric distortions in such image pairs by extracting pseudo-invariant features (PIFs) and using them to establish a more precise MF [6,7,10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, when dealing with image pairs that include significant land cover/land use (LULC) changes, these methods may introduce noise structures and artifacts to the final results because of their equal treatment of all the pixels. SRRN methods, however, are specifically designed to handle radiometric distortions in such image pairs by extracting pseudo-invariant features (PIFs) and using them to establish a more precise MF [6,7,10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite promising results, these methods primarily rely on iteratively identifying PIFs to re-estimate parameters for aligning images. A more advanced SRRN method was recently proposed by Chen et al [10], in which PIFs in the shape of polygons were used to form an RRN model and generate reliable normalized images. Although these methods have shown promising results in RRN, they are limited to working with geo/coregistered image pairs and are therefore incompatible when unregistered input images need to be normalized [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al [36] proposed a series of local linear model approaches and a specific global cost function that can correct global and local color discrepancies simultaneously and preserve image gradient as much as possible. Chen et al [37] proposed pseudo-invariant feature-based algorithms with polygon features through single-band and multiple-band regression, and applied them to radiometric normalization between Sentinel-2A and Landsat-8 OLI images. The effectiveness of the proposed algorithm is demonstrated by comparing the results with the histogram matching method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different from the method that fits the pixel-to-pixel features of overlapping region images as previously mentioned, histogram matching is a distribution-based color consistency matching method [19,40]. It can avoid subjectivity in the selection of pseudo point features and image misregistration [37]. The focus of this algorithm is on the digital number (DN) distribution between the subject image and the target image, which is closely linked to the type of terrain objects on the image.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%