2014
DOI: 10.3390/rs6098803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiometric Calibration Methodology of the Landsat 8 Thermal Infrared Sensor

Abstract: The science-focused mission of the Landsat 8 Thermal Infrared Sensor (TIRS) requires that it have an accurate radiometric calibration. A calibration methodology was developed to convert the raw output from the instrument into an accurate at-aperture radiance. The methodology is based on measurements obtained during component-level and instrument-level characterization testing. The radiometric accuracy from the pre-flight measurements was estimated to be approximately 0.7%. The calibration parameters determined… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although, the radiometric and geometric refinements have been implemented in thermal infrared band offsets soon and improved the data accuracy to −2.1 ± 0.8 K for band 10 and −4.4 ± 1.75 K for band 11 at a 300 K brightness temperature respectively, this accuracy still cannot meet the requirements of algorithm application [48,49]. Meanwhile, according to the reprocessing campaign results, this uncertainty is scene-dependent and probably related to out-of-field response in the TIRS instrument, and gives us an obstacle in algorithm validation, for we cannot analyze whether errors are caused by TIRS sensor or the algorithm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, the radiometric and geometric refinements have been implemented in thermal infrared band offsets soon and improved the data accuracy to −2.1 ± 0.8 K for band 10 and −4.4 ± 1.75 K for band 11 at a 300 K brightness temperature respectively, this accuracy still cannot meet the requirements of algorithm application [48,49]. Meanwhile, according to the reprocessing campaign results, this uncertainty is scene-dependent and probably related to out-of-field response in the TIRS instrument, and gives us an obstacle in algorithm validation, for we cannot analyze whether errors are caused by TIRS sensor or the algorithm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 2 lists the types of calibrations that are being used by TIRS on-orbit. Although some of the calibration parameters have changed a bit from their ground-based values [6,7,8,16,17], TIRS performance has been very stable [17] since its initial turn on in orbit.…”
Section: On-orbit Calibration Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In what follows, only the basic spatial, spectral and noise requirements are discussed. More detail is given in the other papers in this issue [6][7][8].…”
Section: Requirements Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that this is not the actual gain equation. Instrument gain and bias are covered in detail in [12]. Since launch, the SCA-average metric may have a slowly decreasing trend (maximum of −0.28%/year ± 0.005%/year in the worst case) but the total variability over the lifetime is still only 0.08% (1σ) for the worst case ( Figure 4).…”
Section: Internal Calibratormentioning
confidence: 99%