Radiology Undergraduate and Resident Curricula: A Narrative Review of the Literature

Abstract

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to examine the literature regarding radiology curricula for both undergraduates and residents.MethodsA review of the literature was performed using relevant key words. Articles were retrieved through December 2012 using PubMed, ScienceDirect, ERIC, Proquest, and ICL databases along with a manual review of references.ResultsOf the 4716 unique abstracts reviewed by the author, 142 were found to be relevant to the purpose of this study. Undergraduate radiology education, radiology curriculum, and radiology pedagogy vary widely between disciplines and between colleges within disciplines. Formal radiology education is not taught at all medical programs and little radiology training is incorporated into non-radiology residencies. This results in some medical graduates not being taught how to interpret basic radiology images and not learning contraindications and indications for ordering diagnostic imaging tests. There are no definitive studies examining how to incorporate radiology into the curriculum, how to teach radiology to either undergraduates or residents, or how to assess this clinical competency.ConclusionsThis review shows that radiology education is perceived to be important in undergraduate and residency programs. However, some programs do not include radiology training, thus graduates from those programs do not learn radiology essentials.

Chest X‐ray evaluation training: impact of normal and abnormal image ratio and instructional sequence

“…Additionally, the use of a deductive approach is advised. In many faculties, medical image perception training is provided when students already have acquired some knowledge on anatomy and pathophysiology …”

Musculoskeletal Radiology Teaching at a UK Medical School: Do We Need to Improve?

“…On average 5% of total teaching time is dedicated to radiology (Heptonstall et al, 2016) and only 15% of medical schools have a formal radiology curriculum in place (Bhogal et al, 2012). The same variability is found across Europe (Ischerwood and Thomsen, 1993;Lass and Scheffler, 2003;Kourdioukova et al, 2011) and the United States (Gunderman et al, 2003;Barzansky and Etzel, 2004;Linaker, 2015). In the United Kingdom, it has been reported that junior doctors feel radiology teaching at medical school is unstructured and insufficient, ultimately resulting in them being unprepared for work (Nyhsen et al, 2011(Nyhsen et al, , 2013, with similar findings in Canada (Dmytriw et al, 2015) and New Zealand (Subramaniam et al, 2005).…”

“…Many studies have found that medical undergraduates perceive radiology to be an important aspect of education (Boissonnault et al, 2014;Linaker, 2015). However, the amount of time given to teaching radiology to medical students in the United Kingdom varies widely (Kalami et al, 2016).…”

Tumor imaging instruction and assessment at chiropractic colleges in North America: a pilot study with implications for National Board of Chiropractic Examiners content

“…Students spend up to 35 hours a week in the classroom. [2][3][4][5][6] Students experience stress for many reasons, such as financial issues, fatigue, length of time in the program, and stress levels have been linked to sex. 2,3 Students are required to pass high stakes exams to obtain licensure.…”

“…''However, a dearth of literature exists examining how radiology is taught, learned, or evaluated.'' 4 The overriding issue that guides most instructors is whether material is clinically important for students to master. It is important to remain focused on the needs of the students and what they should know to practice competently.…”