2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2008.02.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiologists' Clinical Practice of Neuroimaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By 2003, 24% of certificate holders in each field were not spending even 30% of their clinical work time in the field. The percentages of respondents who did not report the field as their main specialty were even larger, 29% of certificate holders in neuroradiology and 33% in interventional radiology [2,3]. The number of fields in which a radiologist concentrates showed major trends by practice size (Figs.…”
Section: Subspecialization As Concentration In a Limited Number Of Fimentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By 2003, 24% of certificate holders in each field were not spending even 30% of their clinical work time in the field. The percentages of respondents who did not report the field as their main specialty were even larger, 29% of certificate holders in neuroradiology and 33% in interventional radiology [2,3]. The number of fields in which a radiologist concentrates showed major trends by practice size (Figs.…”
Section: Subspecialization As Concentration In a Limited Number Of Fimentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Nonetheless, fully three fourths of all U.S. radiologists interpret at least some neuro images. Approximately 30% spend 5% or more of their clinical work time in the field, although only 13% have the certificate of additional qualification, have completed a neuroradiology fellowship, or have a heavy concentration of work time in the field [3].…”
Section: What Will Examinees Do? What Should Training Programs Do? Whmentioning
confidence: 99%