2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-013-3072-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiological work-up after mass casualty incidents: are ATLS guidelines applicable?

Abstract: • Radiological imaging protocols can assist the management of mass casualty incidents needs. • Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) radiological guidelines have been developed. • But radiological guidelines have not frequently been applied in aeroplane crashes. • Aircraft accidents are of high energy so ATLS guidelines should be applied. • Following mass casualty incidents total body CT seems appropriate within ATLS protocols.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding this, recent guidelines for the management of bleeding and coagulopathy recommend that the time elapsed between injury and operation should be minimized [8]. Plain X-rays of the chest and pelvis, focused assessment sonograph trauma (FAST), and organ-specific computed tomography (CT) are conventional evaluation methods in the early diagnostic work-up in MTPs which is recommended by the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS®) protocol [9],[10]. However, it often results in misdiagnosis of some potential life-threatening solid organ injuries and is time-consuming [4],[11]-[16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding this, recent guidelines for the management of bleeding and coagulopathy recommend that the time elapsed between injury and operation should be minimized [8]. Plain X-rays of the chest and pelvis, focused assessment sonograph trauma (FAST), and organ-specific computed tomography (CT) are conventional evaluation methods in the early diagnostic work-up in MTPs which is recommended by the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS®) protocol [9],[10]. However, it often results in misdiagnosis of some potential life-threatening solid organ injuries and is time-consuming [4],[11]-[16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extensive use of computed tomographic scan in modern day trauma care might explain the decrease in missed spinal injuries. 29 The segmental distribution of injuries in our study revealed a low number of cervical fractures (14.8% of injuries) compared with general trauma literature (18%-21%). 2 , 3 , 16 In spinal fractures sustained in MVAs, the cervical spine comprises about 40% of all spine fractures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 42%
“…There have been some observational reports of the time needed for different imaging modalities in trauma patients. 10,20 Depending on the imaging methods and algorithms chosen, significant time reduction can be achieved for imaging examinations. Imaging during MCI patient work-up needs to be straightforward, robust and as comprehensive as possible.…”
Section: Capacity Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Imaging utilization has been reported as high as 93% of victims in one study in the military setting of three explosive MCIs in Iraq in 2008 and 72% of victims in a large civilian airplane crash in 2009 in the Netherlands, exceeding numbers previously reported in literature. 9,10 Imaging providers must therefore be prepared to support treatment teams during DMP activation after MCIs. However, in the multinational, multi Level 1 trauma centre experience of the authors, radiology departments are underrepresented in-and in many cases excluded from-the DMPs of hospitals or associated drills.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%