2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2017.10.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiological survey of the covered and uncovered drilling mud depository

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ambient dose equivalent rate H*(10) (nSv•h −1 ) was reported by Sanada et al to be equivalent to the absorbed dose rate in air (nGy•h −1 ) (Sanada et al, 2020). In this research, H*(10) after deducting the contribution of cosmic rays is considered as the absorbed dose rate in air caused by terrestrial components, while the contribution of other gamma radiation sources in the air is considered negligible (Jónás et al, 2018;UNSCEAR, 2000). The theoretical formula for calculating the absorbed dose rate in air caused by the component of the cosmic rays is as follows:…”
Section: Field Measurement Of Ambient Dose Equivalent Rate H*(10)mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The ambient dose equivalent rate H*(10) (nSv•h −1 ) was reported by Sanada et al to be equivalent to the absorbed dose rate in air (nGy•h −1 ) (Sanada et al, 2020). In this research, H*(10) after deducting the contribution of cosmic rays is considered as the absorbed dose rate in air caused by terrestrial components, while the contribution of other gamma radiation sources in the air is considered negligible (Jónás et al, 2018;UNSCEAR, 2000). The theoretical formula for calculating the absorbed dose rate in air caused by the component of the cosmic rays is as follows:…”
Section: Field Measurement Of Ambient Dose Equivalent Rate H*(10)mentioning
confidence: 91%