2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2008.08.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiological factors related to pre-operative hearing levels in patients with vestibular schwannomas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…VS side and VS stage showed no significant correlation with audiologic deterioration, similar to findings in literature (8,9,17,18,36). Increasing age showed a significant relationship with worse hearing, both in the VS affected as in the unaffected group.…”
Section: Predictors Of Change In Audiologic Functionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…VS side and VS stage showed no significant correlation with audiologic deterioration, similar to findings in literature (8,9,17,18,36). Increasing age showed a significant relationship with worse hearing, both in the VS affected as in the unaffected group.…”
Section: Predictors Of Change In Audiologic Functionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In contrast, six studies supported the correlation between hearing loss and tumor size/volume (9,14,15,(24)(25)(26). In a pilot study with a small sample size (n = 44), Day et al reported a trend correlation between tumor size and audiometric configuration with small tumor (<1 cm) in normal and rising types, medium tumor (1.0-2.5 cm) in mid-and high-frequency hearing loss, and large tumor (>2.5 cm) in flat and deafness types (14).…”
Section: Tumor Size/volumementioning
confidence: 85%
“…), pathological alteration in the inner ear, aberrant inflammatory response, gene mutation, aberrant DNA methylation, etc. (9)(10)(11)(12)(13). But the existing data remains controversial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. the shape of VS was classified as oval (the shortest axial diameter <90% of the longest diameter), round (the shortest axial diameter 90% of the longest diameter) or multi-lobulated; 6 . the surface of the lesion was classified as smooth or irregular; 7 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximal diameter and volume of the VS were calculated. Further tumor characteristics that were gathered were: the shape of VS was classified as oval (the shortest axial diameter <90% of the longest diameter), round (the shortest axial diameter ≥90% of the longest diameter) or multi-lobulated; 6 the surface of the lesion was classified as smooth or irregular; 7 the internal structure of the lesion was classified as cystic or homogeneous; and the major axis of tumor growth was also described in order to analyse a correlation between the edema location and the potential tumor compressive effect. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%