1998
DOI: 10.2172/12094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiological considerations in the operation of the low-energy undulator test line (LEUTL).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This corresponds to a total of 1 kW average electron beam power [29]. Radiological controls at LEA are supported by radiological analysis [30].…”
Section: Safety Controlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This corresponds to a total of 1 kW average electron beam power [29]. Radiological controls at LEA are supported by radiological analysis [30].…”
Section: Safety Controlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LEA beamline is housed within bulk shielding to protect personnel outside the beamline enclosure from prompt electromagnetic radiation hazards associated with electron beam operation [30]. The accelerator enclosure is surrounded by an earth berm, illustrated in figure 9.…”
Section: Engineered Controlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among the scenarios analyzed involving beam losses at various APS components, the maximum credible incident (MCI) is based upon a scenario in which the electron beam is lost at the highest elevation in the rising section of the LEUTL line going from the synchrotron to the mezzanine directly above the region of the beam loss (see Figure 4.3 for the location of the incident) (Moe 1998). According to the analysis for the MCI, in which an APS worker was assumed to stand at a distance of 7.9 ft (2.4 m) from the loss point through the 3-ft (1-m) concrete floor of the mezzanine, the estimated dose rate is 13.1 rem/h.…”
Section: -18mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the scenarios analyzed involving beam losses at various APS components, the maximum credible incident (MCI) is based upon a scenario in which the electron beam is lost at the highest elevation in the rising section of the LEUTL line going from the synchrotron to the mezzanine directly above the region of the beam loss (see Figure 4.3 for the location of the (Moe 1998). According to the analysis for the MCI, in which an APS worker was assumed to stand at a distance of 7.9 ft (2.4 m) from the loss point through the 3-ft (1-m) concrete floor of the mezzanine, the estimated dose rate is 13.1 rem/h.…”
Section: Radiological Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%