2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiological characterization of clay mixed red mud in particular as regards its leaching features

Abstract: The reuse of industrial by-products such as red mud is of great importance. In the case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average of the emanation factor was 2.7 %. This variation of the emanation factor of certain materials can be explained by the different emanation coefficients, which depends on the characteristic of the material matrix (Hegedus et al, 2016;Kovacs et al, 2016;Sas et al, 2015b). The results generally match results that were reported in various publications (International Atomic Energy Agency, 2013).…”
Section: Radon Emanation and Massic Exhalation Features Of The Studiesupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The average of the emanation factor was 2.7 %. This variation of the emanation factor of certain materials can be explained by the different emanation coefficients, which depends on the characteristic of the material matrix (Hegedus et al, 2016;Kovacs et al, 2016;Sas et al, 2015b). The results generally match results that were reported in various publications (International Atomic Energy Agency, 2013).…”
Section: Radon Emanation and Massic Exhalation Features Of The Studiesupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The average of the emanation factor was 2.7%. This variation of the emanation factor of certain materials can be explained by the different emanation coefficients, which depends on the characteristic of the material matrix(Hegedus et al, 2016;Kovacs et al, 2016;Sas et al, 2015b). The results generally match those reported in various publications (International Atomic Energy Agency, 2013).…”
supporting
confidence: 85%