Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2021
DOI: 10.3390/medicina57101121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiological and Physiological Predictors of IPF Mortality

Abstract: Background and Objectives: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) has a variable clinical course, which ranges from being asymptomatic to progressive respiratory failure. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the novel clinical parameters of IPF patients who receive an anti-fibrotic agent. Materials and Methods: From January 2011 to January 2021, we identified 39 IPF patients at Okinawa Chubu Hospital. Clinical information was obtained, such as laboratory data, pulmonary function test (PFT) results, and chest… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…19,20 UIP-positive patients would be expected to display a downward trend in FVC, DLco and higher KL-6 values in the diseased population, but our cohort is made up of many different aetiologies, including subacute conditions, and thus the reverse trend in FVC and the lack of significance in DLco and KL-6 was not ultimately surprising. 21,22 The lack of significance in these variables highlights the many confounding factors present in cases of PPF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19,20 UIP-positive patients would be expected to display a downward trend in FVC, DLco and higher KL-6 values in the diseased population, but our cohort is made up of many different aetiologies, including subacute conditions, and thus the reverse trend in FVC and the lack of significance in DLco and KL-6 was not ultimately surprising. 21,22 The lack of significance in these variables highlights the many confounding factors present in cases of PPF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significance was observed in the prevalence of focal UIP in smokers vs. non- smokers, which was predictable as the criteria for focal UIP positivity was lower than that for pathological UIP; we thus assumed greater stratification between diseased and non-diseased patients. Although a patient cohort comprised entirely of typical UIP positive patients would be expected to display a downward trend in FVC, DLco, and higher KL-6 values in the diseased population, our cohort is made up of many different etiologies, including subacute conditions, and thus the reverse trend in FVC and the lack of significance in DLco and KL-6 was not ultimately surprising [21,22]. The lack of significance in these variables highlights the many confounding factors present in cases of PPF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%