2020
DOI: 10.14245/ns.1836072.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiological and Clinical Outcomes of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in Older Patients: A Comparative Analysis of Young-Old Patients (Ages 65–74 Years) and Middle-Old Patients (Over 75 Years)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The clinical outcomes of ADF were limited by various factors, such as duration of symptoms, age, BMI, and preoperative MRI spinal cord signal changes [ 2 , 25 ]. Regarding the association between radiographic parameters and surgical outcomes after ADF, in a retrospective study comparing ADF results between young-old patients and middle-old patients, there was no significant difference in cervical lordosis and C2-7SVA between the two groups and no significant difference in clinical outcomes [ 26 ]. Another retrospective study showed that low postoperative cervical spine alignment change was a risk factor for poor recovery after ADF [ 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical outcomes of ADF were limited by various factors, such as duration of symptoms, age, BMI, and preoperative MRI spinal cord signal changes [ 2 , 25 ]. Regarding the association between radiographic parameters and surgical outcomes after ADF, in a retrospective study comparing ADF results between young-old patients and middle-old patients, there was no significant difference in cervical lordosis and C2-7SVA between the two groups and no significant difference in clinical outcomes [ 26 ]. Another retrospective study showed that low postoperative cervical spine alignment change was a risk factor for poor recovery after ADF [ 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical outcomes of ADF were limited by various factors, such as duration of symptoms, age, BMI, and preoperative MRI spinal cord signal changes [2,25]. Regarding the association between radiographic parameters and surgical outcomes after ADF, in a retrospective study comparing ADF results between young-old patients and middle-old patients, there was no signi cant difference in cervical lordosis and C2-7SVA between the two groups and no signi cant difference in clinical outcomes [26]. Another retrospective study showed that low postoperative cervical spine alignment change was a risk factor for poor recovery after ADF [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lee et al (2020) studied differences in elderly patients with cohorts separated into those 65e74 years of age and those age 75 or older, finding no difference between groups after ACDF regarding VAS pain scores, NDI score, or Odom's criteria. 28 Croci et al (2022) separated their patients into three groups: young (<65 years), early elderly (65e74 years), and late elderly (75 years) and found the young patients to have worse significantly worse VAS pain and NDI scores preoperatively and at three and twelve months postoperative compared to the two older cohorts. 29 Further, NDI and VAS arm pain scores improved significantly more in the two older groups at the three-month period; however, overall MCID achievement was greater in VAS arm and NDI for younger patients.…”
Section: Literature Cross-analysismentioning
confidence: 99%