1999
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.172.6.10350278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiologic investigation of renal colic: unenhanced helical CT compared with excretory urography.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
90
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
90
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…CT scan equals the accuracy of the IVP in determining the presence of obstruction, but surpasses the IVP in terms of detecting the specific cause of the obstruction. 1,16 In our study, CT scan was done in three patients as the urea creatinine were more >2mg/dl and in these patients IVP was not possible. MRI gives no added advantage over CT scan and it does not visualise the stones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…CT scan equals the accuracy of the IVP in determining the presence of obstruction, but surpasses the IVP in terms of detecting the specific cause of the obstruction. 1,16 In our study, CT scan was done in three patients as the urea creatinine were more >2mg/dl and in these patients IVP was not possible. MRI gives no added advantage over CT scan and it does not visualise the stones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Urinary stones can be classified on the basis of their size, location, X-ray characteristics, aetiology, composition (Mineralogy) and risk groups for recurrent stone formation. 1 Ultrasonography is used as primary modality in diagnosing this disease. A renal contrast study (Enhanced CT or Intravenous Urography) is indicated while planning treatment for a renal stone in addition to assess the function of the affected kidney.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unenhanced CT has been found to have better diagnostic performance than IVP, with sensitivity and specificity rates over 95%. [3][4][5][6][7][8] These diagnostic performances are also significantly better than a diagnostic approach combining KUB radiography and ultrasonography, particularly for stones less than 5 mm in size. 6,7 For these reasons, the American College of Radiology recommends unenhanced CT as the technique of choice for renal stone imaging, 9 as do the American Urological Association 10 and the European Association of Urology.…”
Section: Ré Sumémentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4] NCT has become the method of choice for evaluating patients with acute renal colic. [5][6][7][8] Transabdominal ultrasound (US) has the advantages of being universally available, not exposing the patient to radiation and being independent of kidney function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%