2018
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017161458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiologic Features of Small Pulmonary Nodules and Lung Cancer Risk in the National Lung Screening Trial: A Nested Case-Control Study

Abstract: Purpose Using data and images from the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST), we extracted radiological features from small pulmonary nodules (SPNs) that did not meet the original criteria to be considered a positive screen and identified features associated with lung cancer risk. Methods We extracted radiological features from SPNs of baseline low-dose computed tomography screens that did not meet NLST criteria to be considered a positive screen. SPNs were identified for 73 incidence case patients that were … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…34 A separate study was conducted to identify semantic features from small pulmonary nodules (less than 6 mm) to predict lung cancer incidence in the lung cancer screening setting and the revealed final model yielded an area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic of 0.930 based on total emphysema score, attachment to vessel, nodule location, border definition, and concavity. 54 Although there was an imbalance between malignant and benign nodules in the aforementioned analyses, these studies provide compelling evidence for the utility of semantic features in lung cancer screening. As with nodules detected in the lung cancer screening setting, the standard of care for incidental pulmonary nodules lacks accurate decision tools for predicting malignancy versus benign disease and indolent versus aggressive behavior.…”
Section: Clinical Applications Of Ai In Lung Cancer Screeningmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…34 A separate study was conducted to identify semantic features from small pulmonary nodules (less than 6 mm) to predict lung cancer incidence in the lung cancer screening setting and the revealed final model yielded an area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic of 0.930 based on total emphysema score, attachment to vessel, nodule location, border definition, and concavity. 54 Although there was an imbalance between malignant and benign nodules in the aforementioned analyses, these studies provide compelling evidence for the utility of semantic features in lung cancer screening. As with nodules detected in the lung cancer screening setting, the standard of care for incidental pulmonary nodules lacks accurate decision tools for predicting malignancy versus benign disease and indolent versus aggressive behavior.…”
Section: Clinical Applications Of Ai In Lung Cancer Screeningmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In a recent study, a model incorporating 4 quantitatively scored semantic features (short‐axis diameter, contour, concavity, and texture) conferred an accuracy of 74.3% to distinguish malignant from benign nodules in the lung cancer screening setting . A separate study was conducted to identify semantic features from small pulmonary nodules (less than 6 mm) to predict lung cancer incidence in the lung cancer screening setting and the revealed final model yielded an area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic of 0.930 based on total emphysema score, attachment to vessel, nodule location, border definition, and concavity . Although there was an imbalance between malignant and benign nodules in the aforementioned analyses, these studies provide compelling evidence for the utility of semantic features in lung cancer screening.…”
Section: Lung Cancer Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In radiology, bootstrapping has been used in a trial of Small Pulmonary Nodules and Cancer Risk in the National Lung Screening Trial (27). In that study, multivariate models were generated with findings validated by bootstrapping in a subset of 125 patients with a screening-detected lung cancer and prior negative CT screening studies, along with 250 case-matched controls with small 4À6 mm lung nodules.…”
Section: Booting With the Bootstrapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second dataset 22,23 included 47 adenocarcinoma patients who underwent surgical resection as first course therapy at the Maastricht Radiation Oncology Clinic and had presurgical CT scans within 2 months prior to surgery. The third dataset included 234 patients 24,25 diagnosed with screen-detected incident lung cancers in the National Lung Screening Trial. The fourth dataset included 103 adenocarcinoma patients from the radiogenomics dataset that was described above.…”
Section: Prognostic Validation Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%