2020
DOI: 10.1111/clr.13655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiologic comparative analysis between saline and platelet‐rich fibrin filling after hydraulic transcrestal sinus lifting without adjunctive bone graft: A randomized controlled trial

Abstract: Objectives To evaluate implant survival rate, any complications, and changes in residual alveolar bone height (RABH) using saline or platelet‐rich fibrin (PRF) filling after hydraulic transcrestal sinus lifting. Methods Dental implants were placed after hydraulic transcrestal sinus lifting and the filling of saline (20 patients) or PRF (20 patients). Outcome measurements were implant survival, any complications, and RABH changes. Cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were taken and compared preoperatively… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Current implant systems are increasingly using methods for reconstruction of the alveolar process to allow optimal positioning of implants for esthetic and functional purposes [1][2][3][4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current implant systems are increasingly using methods for reconstruction of the alveolar process to allow optimal positioning of implants for esthetic and functional purposes [1][2][3][4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the 15 studies selected for inclusion in this review, five were controlled clinical trials [ 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ], six were randomized clinical trials [ 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ], two retrospective clinical trials [ 13 , 29 ], one clinical-histologic study [ 28 ], and one case report [ 30 ]. These articles were published between January 2006 and August 2020.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implant fixtures of commercially pure titanium (grade IV) were prepared as SA, SA + VUV (TS III SA, Osstem, Seoul, Korea), and SA + VUV + BS (TS III SOI, Osstem) for use in this study. As shown in Figure 1a,b, the surface roughness of the implant fixtures were measured to be 2.5 ± 0.5 µm of R a value [15], and VUV treatment for photofunctionalization was achieved by exposing an implant fixture to low-pressure mercury-arc lamps emitting UV-C and VUV in UV ozone cleaner for 1 h. Coating the implant surface with a pH-buffering agent, comprising both of positively and negatively charged ionic groups, with 7.31 of pKa value at 37 • C [15,16], was supplemented for better superhydrophilicity (Figure 1c).…”
Section: Preparation Of Implant Fixturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous study, a novel SA surface coated with a pH-buffering agent after vacuum-UV (VUV) treatment was introduced [15,16]. This surface was closely associated with greater affinity for proteins, cells, and platelets, which promoted rapid and stable blood clotting, thrombogenesis, and osseointegration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%