2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2003.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radioimmunodetection and radioimmunotherapy of head and neck cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in recent clinical trials, dendritic cell-based immunotherapy was reported to be safe (29,30), and tumor antigen vaccination in combination with IL-12 showed mild adverse effects (Grade I-II) even though the patients in the study had end-stage cancer (31). Radioimmunotherapy has been employed in the field of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treatment (32)(33)(34) as well as in other cancers (35). However, in these studies, the host immune response evoked via radio-labeled monoclonal antibody was not clearly evaluated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in recent clinical trials, dendritic cell-based immunotherapy was reported to be safe (29,30), and tumor antigen vaccination in combination with IL-12 showed mild adverse effects (Grade I-II) even though the patients in the study had end-stage cancer (31). Radioimmunotherapy has been employed in the field of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treatment (32)(33)(34) as well as in other cancers (35). However, in these studies, the host immune response evoked via radio-labeled monoclonal antibody was not clearly evaluated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bridging assay allows for detection of all immunoglobulin isotypes and classes without the concern of secondary anti-human IgG detection antibody binding to the plate coating antigen or missing specific classes or isotypes of the sample anti-therapeutic antibody. Bridging assays utilizing both one-step [13] and two-step formats [14] have been reported in the literature. Results presented here indicate that the format of the bridging assay can have significant impact on the assay performance, particularly in regard to antigen coating density.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnitude of this effect relies on the used radionuclide and the tissue penetration depth of emitted radiation and may overcome poor dissemination of the radiotherapeutic drug. 3,22 Taken together, the application of RIT simultaneously with or after EBRT was in most cases beneficial to a schedule where RIT was applied prior to external irradiation. It may not make a difference if fractionated EBRT starts some days prior to RIT injection or on the same day, as mAb circulate for several days.…”
Section: 65mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…b-emitters) can destroy adjacent tumour cells by the crossfire effect, that is through the range of radiation in tissue, cells can be killed without having bound the radionuclide itself. 22 This is regarded as a main advantage of RIT for the treatment of solid tumours as plasticity of tumour cells (e.g. loss of target antigen) and delivery barriers can be overcome by some extent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation