1998
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-3798-3_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radioimmunoassay: Ecdysteroids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Methods for directly measuring the juvenile hormone (JH) titer, JH titer regulators, or the ecdysteroid (ECD) titer in endocrine studies of evolution and development (see text for additional information and discussion) JH TITER; RADIOIMMUNOASSAY (RIA) 1 Measurement: 10-100s ml hemolymph (H) required from adults (A) or juveniles (J); titers often can be measured in single individuals (I), especially A Advantage over mass spectrometry/gas chromatography (GC-MS): rapid, esp. if sample purification not required; very useful in populational studies; expensive equipment not required Disadvantage: individual JHs typically cannot be distinguished by the antibody; not recommended for whole-body (WB) titers; no antibody to main JHs of some groups 2 Caveats: potential artifacts due to lack of specificity of antibody or impurities (especially lipids) in sample (background studies essential) Comments: JH RIA technically more difficult to perform than ECD RIA References: Goodman et al (1993), Trumbo et al (1995), Cisper et al (2000), Zhao and Zera (2004a), Goodman and Granger (2005) JH TITER: GC-MS 3 Measurement: typically 100s ml H, or grams WB required; titers typically measured on H pooled from several individuals or WB samples (however see Westerlund and Hoffmann 2004 for assay requiring smaller amount of biological material) Advantage over RIA: most reliable method to measure JH titer; versatileFindividual JHs and JH metabolites can be measured in H or WB Disadvantage: expensive equipment required (mass spectrometer); more labor intensive than RIA; requires prior sample purification Comments: less useful than RIA when many samples must be measured (e.g., population studies) References: Baker (1990), Botens et al (1997), Tawfik et al (2000), Westerlund and Hoffmann (2004), Goodman and Granger (2005) ECDYSTEROID (ECD) TITER RIA 4 Measurement: H (few microliters or less); WB or individual tissues (mg); A, J; I titers often possible Comments: widely used; very rapid, technically simple; less potential for experimental artifacts than JH RIA; References: Warren and Gilbert (1988), Porcheron et al (1989), , Rachinsky and Hartfelder (1990), Koch et al (1996)…”
Section: Jh Titermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods for directly measuring the juvenile hormone (JH) titer, JH titer regulators, or the ecdysteroid (ECD) titer in endocrine studies of evolution and development (see text for additional information and discussion) JH TITER; RADIOIMMUNOASSAY (RIA) 1 Measurement: 10-100s ml hemolymph (H) required from adults (A) or juveniles (J); titers often can be measured in single individuals (I), especially A Advantage over mass spectrometry/gas chromatography (GC-MS): rapid, esp. if sample purification not required; very useful in populational studies; expensive equipment not required Disadvantage: individual JHs typically cannot be distinguished by the antibody; not recommended for whole-body (WB) titers; no antibody to main JHs of some groups 2 Caveats: potential artifacts due to lack of specificity of antibody or impurities (especially lipids) in sample (background studies essential) Comments: JH RIA technically more difficult to perform than ECD RIA References: Goodman et al (1993), Trumbo et al (1995), Cisper et al (2000), Zhao and Zera (2004a), Goodman and Granger (2005) JH TITER: GC-MS 3 Measurement: typically 100s ml H, or grams WB required; titers typically measured on H pooled from several individuals or WB samples (however see Westerlund and Hoffmann 2004 for assay requiring smaller amount of biological material) Advantage over RIA: most reliable method to measure JH titer; versatileFindividual JHs and JH metabolites can be measured in H or WB Disadvantage: expensive equipment required (mass spectrometer); more labor intensive than RIA; requires prior sample purification Comments: less useful than RIA when many samples must be measured (e.g., population studies) References: Baker (1990), Botens et al (1997), Tawfik et al (2000), Westerlund and Hoffmann (2004), Goodman and Granger (2005) ECDYSTEROID (ECD) TITER RIA 4 Measurement: H (few microliters or less); WB or individual tissues (mg); A, J; I titers often possible Comments: widely used; very rapid, technically simple; less potential for experimental artifacts than JH RIA; References: Warren and Gilbert (1988), Porcheron et al (1989), , Rachinsky and Hartfelder (1990), Koch et al (1996)…”
Section: Jh Titermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RIAs were performed according to Warren & Gilbert (1988) with minor modifications (Sakurai et al 1998, Takaki & Sakurai 2003 (approximately 10 000 c.p.m. in 100 µl borate buffer) and the 6000-fold-diluted 0-6 anti-ecdysone antiserum (Yokoyama et al 1996) in 100 mM borate buffer (100 mM boric acid, 50 mM borax and 60 mM NaCl, pH 8·4) containing 0·02% sodium azide, 0·05% rabbit IgG (Miles, Kankakee, IL, USA) and 0·2% BSA (fraction V; Sigma) were added to aliquots of the extracts.…”
Section: E Titrementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pooled solvents were evaporated, and the residues, along with the selected residues of samples after their RP-HPLC or TLC purification, were subjected to RIA. The H22 antibody was used for embryo titers (13), and the SHO3 antibody for chromatography residues (14). Results are expressed in ecdysone equivalents.…”
Section: Riamentioning
confidence: 99%