2007
DOI: 10.1177/0363546506293024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiographic Measures of Knee Alignment in Patients with varus Gonarthrosis

Abstract: These findings are inconsistent with the hypothesis that mechanical axis angle measured in single-limb standing is more representative of dynamic joint load and further highlight the differences between static and dynamic measures. Results also underscore the importance of reporting patient position during radiographs and keeping positions consistent when evaluating patients over time.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
62
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
62
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They found that when measured at different foot positions (15°external and internal rotation), the mechanical axis deviated by as much as 3.59°. Specogna et al [35] noted divergent measurement results when the lower limbs did not bear weight uniformly, finding a mean varus deviation of 7.1°in a group of patients with uniform loading of the lower limbs compared with 8.7°in patients who stood on both lower limbs but only one bore the body weight. Langenbach et al [36] found that standing radiographs were superior to recumbent images, and Lonner et al [37] stressed a significant influence on results of even slight flexion at the knee.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that when measured at different foot positions (15°external and internal rotation), the mechanical axis deviated by as much as 3.59°. Specogna et al [35] noted divergent measurement results when the lower limbs did not bear weight uniformly, finding a mean varus deviation of 7.1°in a group of patients with uniform loading of the lower limbs compared with 8.7°in patients who stood on both lower limbs but only one bore the body weight. Langenbach et al [36] found that standing radiographs were superior to recumbent images, and Lonner et al [37] stressed a significant influence on results of even slight flexion at the knee.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference between these two values was used to determine the reduction in serum hemoglobin and thereby estimate the bleeding. Patients who received transfusion of red blood cells or other blood products were excluded.Appearance of the surgical wound one week after the procedure.Functional scales were applied twice a year by examiners blinded to the allocation of groups: the Knee Society Score (KSS), 12 the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), 13 and the Kujala Scale 14 ; were applied twice a year by examiners blinded to the allocation of groups.Alignment of the operated limb in the frontal orthostatic panoramic radiography, bipedal, six months after surgery, through the method of anatomical axes of the femur and tibia in the frontal plane 15

Patellar tilt in the axial radiography six months after surgery, according to the technique previously described 16 (Fig.

…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Femoral and tibial component were cemented. The mechanical axis angles between the tibial axis and an axis connection knee and hip joint centers were determined by radiographs during two legged stance (Specogna et al, 2007;Colebatch et al, 2009). No subject had further joint replacements except K2L, whose contralateral knee had been replaced 6 months previously.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%