2017
DOI: 10.1177/2325967117739252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiographic Location Does Not Ensure a Precise Anatomic Location of the Femoral Fixation Site in Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction

Abstract: Background:A frequently used method to determine the anatomic femoral fixation point in the operating room during medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is the radiographic method. However, the ability of this radiological method to establish an anatomic femoral attachment point might not be as accurate as expected.Purpose:(1) To evaluate the accuracy of the radiological method to locate the anatomic femoral fixation point in MPFL reconstruction surgery and (2) to determine the factors influencin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Several articles have described radiographic landmarks of the MPFL 7,31,48,55,69,76 ; however, others have questioned the accuracy of performing anatomic reconstruction using these radiographic landmarks. 53,80 In this study, the center of the dimple was, on average, 7.2 mm (95% CI, 6.3-8.2 mm) distal and 4.6 mm (95% CI, 4.0-5.2 mm) anterior to the adductor tubercle. We argue that surgeons can use the adductor magnus tendon to routinely locate the adductor tubercle to find the ideal position for MPFL reconstruction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Several articles have described radiographic landmarks of the MPFL 7,31,48,55,69,76 ; however, others have questioned the accuracy of performing anatomic reconstruction using these radiographic landmarks. 53,80 In this study, the center of the dimple was, on average, 7.2 mm (95% CI, 6.3-8.2 mm) distal and 4.6 mm (95% CI, 4.0-5.2 mm) anterior to the adductor tubercle. We argue that surgeons can use the adductor magnus tendon to routinely locate the adductor tubercle to find the ideal position for MPFL reconstruction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Moreover, radiographic identification of Schöttle points does not guarantee the precise anatomic location of the femoral fixation site. 13 Besides providing a stronger fixation (bony attachment), placing the femoral fixation more proximally at the adductor magnus tendon will increase the distances between the femoral and patellar attachments points during knee flexion and augment the tension to the patella. 14 Using the adductor tubercle for femoral fixation has been shown to not change the patellofemoral joint contact area and pressure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distance from the femoral insertion of the MPFL to the adductor tubercle is less variable than the distance to the medial femoral epicondyle, 12 which makes the adductor tubercle often used for femoral fixation in MPFL reconstructions. Moreover, radiographic identification of Schöttle points does not guarantee the precise anatomic location of the femoral fixation site 13 . Besides providing a stronger fixation (bony attachment), placing the femoral fixation more proximally at the adductor magnus tendon will increase the distances between the femoral and patellar attachments points during knee flexion and augment the tension to the patella 14 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Não há consenso na literatura sobre qual é o mais confiável, havendo defensores de uma ou outra ou ambas as opções, como citado por Caplan et al (25) . Dentre estas alternativas, há autores que apontaram o método palpatório com maior chance de erros no posicionamento (60,98,148,149) , enquanto outros relataram que pequenas variações tanto na rotação do joelho quanto nos aparelhos de radioscopia ou de raios X resultam num posicionamento intraoperatório inadequado (99,(101)(102)(103) . Na técnica cirúrgica realizada nesta pesquisa, realizou-se o posicionamento do túnel femoral pelo método palpatório das referências anatômicas do TA e do EP devido à execução simples, à experiência do cirurgião com o método e à prevenção de exposição da equipe cirúrgica e do paciente à radiação dos raios X, ratificando-se o relato de Sanchis-Alfonso et al (100) .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Sanchis-Alfonso et al (103) , em 2017, novamente estudaram a localização anatômica do túnel femoral do LPFM em imagens tridimensionais na TC.…”
Section: Concluíram Que Os Métodos Radiográficos Descritos Não Permitunclassified