2001
DOI: 10.1177/107327480100800302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiographic Imaging of Musculoskeletal Neoplasia

Abstract: The technological advances seen in recent years in all areas of imaging have improved the capabilities of these modalities to assist in the diagnosis, definition of tumor extent, and accurate staging of musculoskeletal tumors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
38
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Large studies comparing CT and MRI for RPS are lacking; given the difficulty in obtaining high-quality MRI without motion artifacts, most investigators rely on CT [11]. Vascular imaging is rarely necessary for treatment planning.…”
Section: Diagnosis and Stagingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Large studies comparing CT and MRI for RPS are lacking; given the difficulty in obtaining high-quality MRI without motion artifacts, most investigators rely on CT [11]. Vascular imaging is rarely necessary for treatment planning.…”
Section: Diagnosis and Stagingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Conflicting evidence exists to support which MR sequence allows the optimal measurement of osseous tumour extent for surgical resection planning [3,6,8,12,28,30]. It has been reported that STIR techniques highlight peri-tumour tissue, which may cause subsequent inaccuracy in measurement of tumour extent [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…MRI is a detailed, high-resolution modality that has the ability to image in multiple planes. This high level of softtissue resolution makes MRI the method of choice when defining tumour margins pre-operatively [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metastatik kanserler iskelet sisteminin en sık görülen neoplastik lezyonlarıdır [,2,6,8]. Çe-şitli çalışmalarda kemik sintigrafisinin konvansiyonel radyografik tetkiklere göre metastazları saptamada daha sensitif olduğu gösterilmiştir [10][11][12]. Kemik metastazının direkt grafide izlenebilmesi için kemik mineral yoğunluğunun yaklaşık % 50 oranın-da değişmesi gerekmekte olup metastazlar kemik sintigrafisinde direkt grafiye göre ortalama 6 ay önce saptanabilmektedir [13].…”
Section: Discussionunclassified