Radiographic Features of Mandibular Trabecular Bone Structure in Hypodontia

M.Creton,; Geraets, W.G.M.; Verhoeven, J. W.; Stelt, P F van der; Verhey, Hans G. C.; Cune, Marco S.

doi:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00246.x

Cited by 10 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 28 publications

(53 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These findings could be used not only as criteria for ED diagnostics, but could be applied during treatment planning of ED patients in prosthetics design with respective support for dental implants. Nevertheless, in other study, no difference of trabecular mandibular structure was noted between healthy and ED subjects [23]. Use of CBCT helped to understand that maxillary sinus volume and its surface area among patients with ED were statistically smaller compared to control group of individuals without the above-mentioned pathology [24].…”

Section: Oral and Dental Signs Of Ectodermal Dysplasiamentioning

confidence: 82%

Key aspects of dental diagnostics and treatment specifics in ectodermal dysplasia patients: comprehensive literature review

Goncharuk-Khomyn¹,

Yavuz²,

Cavalcanti³

et al. 2020

jos

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Pathogenesis of ectodermal dysplasia (ED) is explained by alterations occurring within derivates of ectoderm, caused by different genetic violations. Objectives: The aim of this study was to provide critical comprehensive literature review considering diagnostic and treatment specifics among dental patients with ED. Material and methods: Comprehensive literature search was provided via PubMed database (https://pubmed. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) and Google Scholar search engine (https://scholar.google.com/). Systematized number of publications was evaluated as a subject of manual content analysis, categories of which included dental diagnostic and treatment aspects of patients with ED. . Results: Treatment approaches for remaining deciduous and permanent teeth under the condition of future prosthodontic rehabilitation planning differ in numbers of publications dedicated to the topic of dental care provision among ED patients. Such non-consistency could be explained by diversities in described prosthetic rehabilitation protocols, and initial variations of teeth's form, structure, developmental stages, and their overall quantity registered during primary examination of ED dental patients, including possible alterations in enamel integrity, dispersions in pulp chamber volume, caries intensity levels, changes in root formation stages, and eruption phases during ED. Conclusions: The most prominent dental and oral signs of ED that potentially could be used as criteria for diagnostics with varying degree of diagnostic significance, include oligodontia, delayed eruption and development of teeth, changed tooth crown and/or root morphology, decreased salivary function, cleft lip and/or palate. However, there is no unified algorithm of ED dental patients' rehabilitation, and planning of such should consider a number of initial clinical situation's factors, ED manifestations, individual functional prognosis, and esthetic demands.

show abstract

Section: Oral and Dental Signs Of Ectodermal Dysplasiamentioning

confidence: 82%

Key aspects of dental diagnostics and treatment specifics in ectodermal dysplasia patients: comprehensive literature review

Goncharuk-Khomyn¹,

Yavuz²,

Cavalcanti³

et al. 2020

jos

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The jawbone density in ectodermal dysplasia patients, for example, is higher (32,33). The latter seems to apply to ectodermal dysplasia patients only, as Cr eton et al (34) could not demonstrate notable radiographic differences in the structure of mandibular trabecular bone between hypodontia patients without ectodermal dysplasia and healthy subjects. So, other factors are responsible for the higher loss of implants in patients with severe hypodontia such as location and amount of available bone (16, 17, 20-23, 26, 35).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 94%

Prosthetic treatment outcome in patients with severe hypodontia: a systematic review

Filius

Cune

Raghoebar

et al. 2016

J of Oral Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Severe hypodontia (≥6 missing teeth) is associated with aesthetic and functional problems. Its presentation is heterogenic, and a variety of treatment modalities are used resulting in different treatment outcomes. As there is currently no standard treatment approach for patients with severe hypodontia, the literature was systematically reviewed with the focus on treatment outcomes. Medline, Embase and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched (last search 24 August 2015). This was completed with a manual search of the reference lists of the selected studies. To be included, studies had to describe dental treatment outcome measure(s) in patients with severe hypodontia; there were no language restrictions. The methodological quality was assessed using MINORS criteria. Twenty-one studies were eligible, but the diversity in type and quality did not allow for a meta-analysis; seventeen studies had a retrospective design; sixteen studies described the results of implant treatment. Treatment with (partial) dentures, orthodontics, fixed crowns or bridges was sparsely presented in the eligible studies. Implant survival, the most frequently reported treatment outcome, ranging from 35·7% to 98·7%, was influenced by 'location' and 'bone volume'. The results of implant treatment in severe hypodontia patients are promising, but due to its heterogenic presentation, its low prevalence and the poor quality of the studies, evidence-based decision-making in the treatment of severe hypodontia is not yet feasible, thus prompting further research.

show abstract

“…Cré ton et al [147], found that FD of the mandibular trabeculae, correlates with the number of congenitally missing teeth in patients with hypodontia.…”

Section: Variousmentioning

confidence: 98%