2020
DOI: 10.4103/sej.sej_58_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiographic evaluation of root canal treatments performed by undergraduate students at the Dakar Dental School

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the present study indicated that separated instruments were found mostly in the MB1 canal of maxillary first molars. This finding is consistent with previous investigations [27][28][29][30][31][32]. A higher rate of separated instruments in first molars than in premolars can be explained by their more difficult access as well as the presence of greater anatomical complexities [29].…”
Section: Separated Instrumentsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of the present study indicated that separated instruments were found mostly in the MB1 canal of maxillary first molars. This finding is consistent with previous investigations [27][28][29][30][31][32]. A higher rate of separated instruments in first molars than in premolars can be explained by their more difficult access as well as the presence of greater anatomical complexities [29].…”
Section: Separated Instrumentsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The present study showed that a range of procedural errors occurred that could readily be detected using CBCT imaging. The overall patterns reported through CBCT evaluation in the present study reinforce the findings of previous studies based on periapical radiographs, with underfilling being the most common procedural error, especially in the MB1 canal of maxillary first molars [10,12,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. Underfilling of root canals in maxillary molars can be explained by their more complex anatomy with narrow and curved root canals and an increased probability of ledge formation compared to maxillary premolars [29].…”
Section: Underfillingsupporting
confidence: 85%