Radiographic evaluation of immediately loaded implants supporting 2–3 units fixed bridges in the posterior maxilla: a 3‐year follow‐up prospective randomized controlled multicenter clinical study

Cesaretti, Gianfranco; Botticelli, Daniele; Renzi, Antonio; Rossi, M; Rossi, Riccardo; Lang, Niklaus P.

doi:10.1111/clr.12565

Cited by 22 publications

(26 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In our study, no implant failures were recorded in any of the loading groups (survival rate of %100). This high survival rate was confirmed by other studies on immediately loaded implants …”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 83%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Effects of different loading protocols on the secondary stability and peri‐implant bone density of the single implants in the posterior maxilla

Akoğlan

Tatlı

Kurtoğlu

et al. 2017

Clin Implant Dent Rel Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 83%

“…In this study, functional load was applied to the acrylic single provisional tooth on the immediate‐loaded implants to assure proper contacts in centric occlusion. Cesaretti and colleagues also used similar technique. They applied functional immediate loading protocol in posterior maxillary bridges and they found similar outcomes.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of different loading protocols on the secondary stability and peri‐implant bone density of the single implants in the posterior maxilla

Akoğlan

Tatlı

Kurtoğlu

et al. 2017

Clin Implant Dent Rel Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Radiographic examination revealed stable marginal bone levels. This clinical outcome is in agreement with other clinical studies concerning immediate loading in partial edentulous patients by conventional approach with the same or longer follow‐up period . A higher torque has been considered for immediate functional loading.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

“…Immediate loading of multiple implants with temporary prosthesis is now considered as a predictable treatment with comparable implant survival rate compared to conventional loading protocol . Immediate functional or nonfunctional loading were both with promising clinical results. However, for better stability during the healing stage, splinted temporary restorations were often the first choice.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Immediate loading of multiple splinted implants via complete digital workflow: A pilot clinical study with 1‐year follow‐up

Jiang

Lin

Cui

et al. 2019

Clin Implant Dent Rel Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Complete digital workflow attracts more attention in implant dentistry. Objectives To explore the feasibility and short‐term clinical results of immediate loading of multiple implants with fixed temporary bridges (2‐4 teeth span) by complete digital workflow, and to evaluate the three‐dimensional (3D) deviation of digital impression comparing with traditional impression method. Material and Methods A total of 31 partial edentulous patients (16 females and 15 males) were recruited in this study. Digital impressions were taken immediately after implant placement, and implant‐supported splinted temporary bridges were fabricated through a full digital approach (model free) and delivered within 24 hours. Final restorations were finished 4 months after surgery via traditional impression technique. Subjects were followed 1 year after treatment. 3D impression deviations were analyzed by comparing the digital and conventional impression methods. Time costs for the full digital approach were recorded. Implant survival rate, marginal bone levels were evaluated. Results All the recruited subjects finished this study. Seventy‐four implants were surgically placed and immediately loaded with 34 temporary bridges fabricated through a full digital approach. Digital impression deviation compared with traditional impression method was 27.43 ± 13.47 μm. Time costs for chair side and laboratory were 32.55 ± 4.73 and 69.30 ± 10.87 minutes, respectively. Marginal bone alterations were −1.58 mm and −1.69 mm at the time of 4 and 12 months after surgery. The implants had a survival rate of 100% at the 1‐year follow‐up time. Conclusions Immediate loading of multiple implants in partial edentulous (2‐4 teeth span) patients with full digital approach is clinically applicable. The 3D discrepancy between digital and traditional impression is within clinical acceptable range.

show abstract

“…In an RCT, 30 patients were recruited, and 71 implants were installed . Restorations were performed with 2‐ or 3‐unit bridges, randomly applied either immediately or after 3 months of undisturbed non‐submerged healing.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Immediate and delayed loading of fixed dental prostheses supported by single or two splinted implants: A histomorphometric study in dogs

Cesaretti

Lang

Viganó

et al. 2018

J of Oral Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To evaluate presumptive differences in osseointegration at implants supporting crowns that are physiologically loaded either immediately or 3 months after installation. All premolars and first molars were extracted bilaterally in six dogs. After 3 months of healing, three implants were installed on the premolar region and two in the molar region in one side of the mandible. Likewise, after another 3 months, five implants were installed in the contralateral side, and impressions were taken bilaterally. Within 48 hours, two single crowns were screwed bilaterally onto two implants in the premolar region, and two splinted crowns reproducing the shape of the first molar were screwed bilaterally onto the implants in the molar region. The mesial implants were used as no-loaded controls. Sacrifices were performed after 3 months, and histological analyses were performed. At the premolar sites, mineralised bone-to-implant contact (MBIC%) was 78.0 ± 4.0% and 70.9 ± 7.9% at the delayed and immediately loaded sites, respectively. This difference was statistically significant. At the control implants, MBIC% was 61.4 ± 14.7% and 63.1 ± 13.1% at the delayed and the immediately loaded sites, respectively. At the molar sites, MBIC% was 79.2 ± 10.9% and 61.1 ± 10.3% at the delayed and immediately loaded sites, respectively. Applying a delayed loading to fixed dental prostheses supported by single or two splinted implants yielded higher proportions of bone-to-implant contact (osseointegration) compared to immediately loaded implants. Moreover, both types of loading protocols yielded a higher rate of osseointegration compared to unloaded implant sites after 3 months following implant installation.

show abstract

Radiographic evaluation of immediately loaded implants supporting 2–3 units fixed bridges in the posterior maxilla: a 3‐year follow‐up prospective randomized controlled multicenter clinical study

Abstract: Survival rates and radiographic bone levels after 1, 2, and 3 years of observation did not differ between conventionally installed implants loaded immediately or delayed (after 3 months). Moreover, insertion torque values did not affect osseointegration.

Cited by 22 publications

References 28 publications

Effects of different loading protocols on the secondary stability and peri‐implant bone density of the single implants in the posterior maxilla

Effects of different loading protocols on the secondary stability and peri‐implant bone density of the single implants in the posterior maxilla

Immediate loading of multiple splinted implants via complete digital workflow: A pilot clinical study with 1‐year follow‐up

Immediate and delayed loading of fixed dental prostheses supported by single or two splinted implants: A histomorphometric study in dogs

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About