2003
DOI: 10.1097/01.id.0000075580.55380.e5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiographic Evaluation of Dental Implants with Different Surface Treatments: An Experimental Study in Dogs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Radiographic examination is an important clinical tool because it is non-invasive and can be easily performed. Taba et al 19 showed a radiographic method based on greylevel analysis using image software to assess the bone density, with results similar to the histopathology. Bone composition can be assessed by Dual X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA), which provides a quantitative measurement of the mineral phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Radiographic examination is an important clinical tool because it is non-invasive and can be easily performed. Taba et al 19 showed a radiographic method based on greylevel analysis using image software to assess the bone density, with results similar to the histopathology. Bone composition can be assessed by Dual X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA), which provides a quantitative measurement of the mineral phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Implant TS lll SA 3.5 × 10 mm (Osstem, Seoul, South Korea) was used, and its size was selected based on mongrel bone width and nerve location. [16] Miniscrews (1.4 × 6 mm, Jeil Medical Co., Seoul, South Korea) were placed 5 mm away from the distal implant as a reference point. Osseointegration of all implants were con rmed using x-ray and resonance frequency analyzer (Ostell Mentor, Ostell, Gothenburg, Sweden) and ISQ values of all implants were over 70.…”
Section: Implant Placementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implant TS lll SA 3.5x10mm (Osstem, Seoul, South Korea) was used, and its size was selected based on mongrel bone width and nerve location. [17] Miniscrews (1.4 x 6 mm, Jeil Medical Co., Seoul, South Korea) were placed 5mm away from the distal implant as a reference point. Osseointegration of all implants were con rmed using a radiograph of the implant and resonance frequency analyzer (Ostell Mentor R , Ostell, Gothenburg, Sweden) and ISQ values of all implants were over 70.…”
Section: Implant Placementmentioning
confidence: 99%