2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2014.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiographic evaluation of complete and incomplete discoid lateral meniscus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
30
2
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
30
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Few studies have investigated plain radiographic findings in groups of CDLM, ICDLM, and normal lateral meniscus knees. Song et al reported a relatively high sensitivity and specificity when fibular height, lateral joint space, lateral tibial eminence height, and condylar cut-off sign were investigated after dividing DLM into CDLM and ICDLM [20]. However, Song et al did not investigate the TEW parameter proposed by the present study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Few studies have investigated plain radiographic findings in groups of CDLM, ICDLM, and normal lateral meniscus knees. Song et al reported a relatively high sensitivity and specificity when fibular height, lateral joint space, lateral tibial eminence height, and condylar cut-off sign were investigated after dividing DLM into CDLM and ICDLM [20]. However, Song et al did not investigate the TEW parameter proposed by the present study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Numerous studies have outlined the morphological characteristics of DLM [7,[21][22][23][24][25] and, compared with a normal meniscus, patients with DLM have a higher frequency of meniscal tears [5,6]. In this study, we showed that most patients with DLM have a horizontal-type PTFJ.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…As for discoid meniscus, there were no statistical differences between complete and incomplete groups for all parameters. Song et al [ 5 ] also carried out a study which is similar to Kim's. They showed different results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%