2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2009.05198.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiographic assessment of alignment following TKA: outline of a standardized protocol and assessment of a newly devised trigonometric method of analysis

Abstract: The study detailed a protocol for the measurement of axial alignment of the limbs and components following TKA, and provided evidence that a newer TM of angle measurement was superior in terms of precision and intra-rater reliability in comparison with the traditional method.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the tibia, the angle called "tibial angle" as well is the equivalent of the so-called "tibial sloping". This angle is an anatomical angle on that sagittal plane, which is formed between a tangent line at the base of the tibial component and a sagittal tibial anatomical line that is formed by connecting the furthest point of the center of the tibial shaft with a point located 10 cm under the knee joint, in the middle of the tibial shaft [3,[9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: The Sagittal Anatomical and Mechanical Axis Of The Tibiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the tibia, the angle called "tibial angle" as well is the equivalent of the so-called "tibial sloping". This angle is an anatomical angle on that sagittal plane, which is formed between a tangent line at the base of the tibial component and a sagittal tibial anatomical line that is formed by connecting the furthest point of the center of the tibial shaft with a point located 10 cm under the knee joint, in the middle of the tibial shaft [3,[9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: The Sagittal Anatomical and Mechanical Axis Of The Tibiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Femoro-tibial malalignment in excess of 3°causes eccentric mechanical loading through the implanted prostheses [4] and is a recognised contributor of early mechanical failure [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Femoro-tibial malalignment in excess of 3° causes eccentric mechanical loading through the implanted prostheses and is a recognized contributor of early mechanical failure. 4,5 A fixed valgus cut angle of either 5° or 6°, with respect to the anatomical axis of the femoral shaft, is frequently used in uncomplicated cases. This strategy uses the anatomical axis as a surrogate for the mechanical axis…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%