2013
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd003046.pub3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiofrequency (thermal) ablation versus no intervention or other interventions for hepatocellular carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
75
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
4
75
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Randomized controlled trials comparing RFA with PEI demonstrate that RFA is superior to ethanol injection in terms of treatment response, number of sessions, recurrences, and overall survival (2-year local recurrence rate: 2 -18 % versus 11 -45 %) [104, 105, 108 -112] as further supported by meta-analyses [88,111,113]. A meta-analysis of six RCTs comparing RFA with PEI and enrolling patients with a tumor size of ≤ 5 cm found RFA significantly superior to PEI with overall survival (HR 1.64, 95 % CI 1.31 to 2.07), and lack of local progression (HR 2.44, 95 % CI 1.71 -3.49) [88]. The efficacy of the methods is similar for tumors ≤ 2 cm [43,104,105,114].…”
Section: Rfa Versus Peimentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Randomized controlled trials comparing RFA with PEI demonstrate that RFA is superior to ethanol injection in terms of treatment response, number of sessions, recurrences, and overall survival (2-year local recurrence rate: 2 -18 % versus 11 -45 %) [104, 105, 108 -112] as further supported by meta-analyses [88,111,113]. A meta-analysis of six RCTs comparing RFA with PEI and enrolling patients with a tumor size of ≤ 5 cm found RFA significantly superior to PEI with overall survival (HR 1.64, 95 % CI 1.31 to 2.07), and lack of local progression (HR 2.44, 95 % CI 1.71 -3.49) [88]. The efficacy of the methods is similar for tumors ≤ 2 cm [43,104,105,114].…”
Section: Rfa Versus Peimentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This analysis assessed the role of specific tumor size thresholds in early HCC, showing that size had a great impact on the effectiveness of RFA but not of surgery. A systematic review of 8000 patients [14] with a current Cochrane analysis [88] reported uncertainty regarding the question of the impact of RFA versus surgery. However, a more recent meta-analysis, published after the Cochrane analysis [89], showed that there were differences in age and liver function between patients with early HCC submitted to either RFA or resection.…”
Section: Rfa Versus Surgical Resection In Small Hccsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is recommended by the EASL-EORTC guidelines for early-stages of HCC in patients who are not eligible for surgery or transplantation. According to an actual systematic Cochrane Database review [35] , there is moderate evidence, that RFA is superior to percutaneous ethanol injection [36] , but inferior to hepatic resection of HCC [37,38] with regard to recurrence-free and overall survival. In contrast, RFA is superior to hepatic resection with regard to procedure-related complications due to the less invasive character of the procedure [39] .…”
Section: Rfamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other forms of ablation such as ethanol injection (PEI) and cryoablation have been abandoned as first-line treatment in favor of RFA, which is associated with a significantly lower local recurrence [29][30][31]. PEI and cryoablation are reserved for lesions in anatomic areas with higher risk of local thermal complications (e.g., abutting the diaphragm, gallbladder, or other viscera).…”
Section: Locoregional Ablationmentioning
confidence: 99%