1979
DOI: 10.1016/0022-2364(79)90023-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiofrequency losses in NMR experiments on electrically conducting samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
105
1
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
105
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the frequency shift, ␦f, upon loading the coil was small. Magnetic losses arise from the additional dissipation of RF power due to eddy currents induced by the RF field in the tissue (24,25). We found for this particular coil that losses from the magnetic interaction within the sample dominate.…”
Section: Dielectric and Magnetic Lossesmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, the frequency shift, ␦f, upon loading the coil was small. Magnetic losses arise from the additional dissipation of RF power due to eddy currents induced by the RF field in the tissue (24,25). We found for this particular coil that losses from the magnetic interaction within the sample dominate.…”
Section: Dielectric and Magnetic Lossesmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Results are summarized in Table 1. The drop in Q upon loading with distilled water, which has a high dielectric constant and a low conductivity, provides a measure of dielectric losses arising from dissipation of RF power due to displacement currents in the tissue (24,25). Because of the balanced coil design, dielectric losses remained small.…”
Section: Dielectric and Magnetic Lossesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the NMR sensitivity deteriorates, because thermal ionic motion induces noise in the receiver coil (39), and the sample is heated by electrolyte friction induced by the electric component of the oscillating radiofrequency field (40). However, the sensitivity loss is insignificant at the low frequencies used here, as also indicated by the negligible difference in 90°pulse length between the H. marismortui and E. coli samples.…”
Section: Mrd Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…An NMR solenoidal coil utilized in MAS probes for solids is usually a multituned coil, which is intended to transmit and receive at largely different resonance frequencies for protons (high frequency) and at resonance frequencies for 13 C and/or 15 N (low frequencies) simultaneously in order to maintain a high sample filling factor. However, the RF magnetic field distributions obtainable in single-coil multiply tuned probes strongly depend on the frequency, because a solenoidal coil with given geometric parameters (in particular, the radius and pitch length) responds quite differently for widely varying frequencies because of the frequency dependency of the wave compression factor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We know that a characteristic spatial translation p exists, which is the turn to turn distance (pitch length) for the helix; that is, upon translation of p in the z direction the longitudinal field components coincide up to a phase factor exp(Ϫj 0 ), where the phase lag per helix turn is defined as 0 ϭ ␤ e p [13] Further, for the helix we have to require a similar periodic boundary condition for a rotation with angle 2z 1 /p in the transverse plane (r, ) and a simultaneous translation by z 1 in the longitudinal direction:…”
Section: Periodic Boundary Conditions For Field Components In Helicesmentioning
confidence: 99%