2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiofrequency ablation of unresectable liver tumors: factors associated with incomplete ablation or local recurrence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
51
2
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
51
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1) are well known factors that have been associated with local tumor control. A tumor size up to 3 cm is now established to be the ideal candidate for RFA, with oncologic outcomes similar to those achieved by surgical resection [16,19,[26][27][28][29]. A recent prospective study documented a local tumor progression (LTP) rate of 3% within 12 months and a local tumor PFS over 95% at 30 months after ablation of CLM with margins over 5 mm and biopsy-proven complete tumor necrosis [30].…”
Section: Radiofrequency Ablationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) are well known factors that have been associated with local tumor control. A tumor size up to 3 cm is now established to be the ideal candidate for RFA, with oncologic outcomes similar to those achieved by surgical resection [16,19,[26][27][28][29]. A recent prospective study documented a local tumor progression (LTP) rate of 3% within 12 months and a local tumor PFS over 95% at 30 months after ablation of CLM with margins over 5 mm and biopsy-proven complete tumor necrosis [30].…”
Section: Radiofrequency Ablationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Residual unablated tissue is a relatively common occurrence after laparoscopic RFA in patients with HCC lesions larger than 3 cm in diameter. 20,21 Therefore, liver ablation must be cautiously considered for liver tumors larger than 3 cm, due to the higher probability of incomplete ablation. Additionally, care must be taken to avoid thermal injury to the major bile ducts, especially when RFA is used in close proximity to the hepatic hilum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The open approaches allowed ablation by means of multiple needle electrode punctures at different angles, which prevented dead ends inside tumors as much as possible. Ayav et al (2010) reported that the rate of incomplete ablation by the percutaneous approach was as high as 18% compared with 13.8% for the open approach. Contradictorily, a lower recurrence rate was at the expense of greater trauma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%