2018
DOI: 10.1159/000447218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiofrequency Ablation of Small Renal Masses: Outcomes, Complications and Effects on Renal Function

Abstract: Introduction: To describe oncological outcomes, effects on renal function and complications with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of T1 renal tumors in an 8-year experience. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study of RFA in 89 consecutive patients between 2005 and 2013 was undertaken. Those with metastatic disease, incomplete follow-up, genetic pre-disposition to renal tumors and biopsy proven benign pathology were excluded, with 79 patients meeting inclusion criteria. Data was collected on demographics, onc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For locally recurrent or oligometastatic RCC, metastasectomy, stereotactic body radiation therapy, or ablative treatment should be considered according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines [ 20 ]. RFA is an appropriate treatment option for small RCC with durable onco-logical outcomes of 94–96.1% disease-free survival and low complication rates [ 21 , 22 ]. Integrated with a systemic treatment strategy, RFA is safe and effective for the treatment of metastatic disease from RCC with good overall survival and long systemic treatment-free survival [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For locally recurrent or oligometastatic RCC, metastasectomy, stereotactic body radiation therapy, or ablative treatment should be considered according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines [ 20 ]. RFA is an appropriate treatment option for small RCC with durable onco-logical outcomes of 94–96.1% disease-free survival and low complication rates [ 21 , 22 ]. Integrated with a systemic treatment strategy, RFA is safe and effective for the treatment of metastatic disease from RCC with good overall survival and long systemic treatment-free survival [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Psutka SP et al, 2013, also reported high disease-free rates of up to 92.3% in patients with RCC T1a after RFA at 3.8-year median follow-up with a median tumor size of 3 cm (IQR: 2.1–3.9 cm) [ 30 ]. The significant advantage of RFA in RCC patients is its minimal influence on renal function that is extremely important in the elderly [ 31 ]. Our study also confirms the absence of renal function impairment after treatment with RFA or TE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Part of this cohort has previously been described with short-term outcomes (median follow-up 29 months) from RFA. 5…”
Section: Cohort Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Procedure protocol and technique has previously been described. 5 All cases were performed percutaneously under local anaesthetic and intravenous sedation. Biopsy was performed through a coaxial sheath concomitantly with ablation.…”
Section: Cohort Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%