2015
DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v7.i2.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiofrequency ablation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: The past, the present and the future

Abstract: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most aggressive cancers with a grim overall 5-year survival rate of 5%. Advances in surgical techniques, critical care, molecular diagnosis, diagnostic imaging, endosonology and adjuvant therapy have improved outcomes; but still more needs to be achieved. There is an urgent need to discover new avenues that may impact survival. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has attracted attention as an adjunctive treatment in PDAC. A review of English literature in PubMed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The combination of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel showed improved survival over gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer [19,20]. For localised disease, encouraging results from stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and irreversible electroporation (IRE) have been reported, though evidence from randomised trials is still lacking [21][22][23][24]. However, the aforementioned treatments are often taxing to the patient, have high toxicity rates, or are still lacking evidence of efficacy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel showed improved survival over gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer [19,20]. For localised disease, encouraging results from stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and irreversible electroporation (IRE) have been reported, though evidence from randomised trials is still lacking [21][22][23][24]. However, the aforementioned treatments are often taxing to the patient, have high toxicity rates, or are still lacking evidence of efficacy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is one of the most aggressive cancers with a 5-year overall survival of approximately 5%. 33,34 It represents the most common malignancy of the pancreas and at the time of diagnosis only in the 20% of cases it is eligible for surgical intervention. The other 80% is represented by metastatic disease and by locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC).…”
Section: Radiofrequency Ablation Of Pancreatic Adenocarcinomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is recognized as one of the least invasive therapeutic options for pancreatic cancer. 1 19 20 However, it should be considered that the pancreas is different from other organs, especially the liver. The first difference is that the physical properties of the pancreas are different from those of the liver and therefore, the RFA protocol for the liver cannot be used in the pancreas.…”
Section: Eus-rfamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been many ex vivo and in vivo studies to determine the optimal thermal kinetic characteristics; however, there is still no standardized protocol for pancreatic RFA. 20 The second difference is in its location. The pancreas, especially the head, is surrounded by the stomach, duodenum, portal vein, superior mesenteric vessels, and bile duct, and as such pancreatic RFA has a risk of thermal injury to surrounding organs.…”
Section: Eus-rfamentioning
confidence: 99%