2013
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1350347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiofrequency Ablation of Osteoid Osteomas: Analgesia and Patient Satisfaction in Long-term Follow-up

Abstract: !Purpose: To review the long term clinical outcomes in the treatment of osteoid osteoma (OO) using radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Materials and Methods: Our retrospective study included 59 patients who were treated in the period from April 2001 to December 2012 due to a symptomatic OO using RFA. Here, the occurrence of complications and postoperative recurrence, as well as postoperative patient satisfaction were examined. Patients satisfaction was assessed by means of a telephone interview with the visual anal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
25
2
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(11 reference statements)
7
25
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, RFA proves to be a better tool in treating symptomatic recurrences after surgical resections (100% vs 90%). 30 Several authors have published articles [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] reporting a significant therapeutic success, confirming the effectiveness of RFA also in the long-term and on large series, showing that RFA is a safe method for treating OO with a low number of complications. Flanagin and Lindskog, 39 in their study, referred an efficacy of this technique equals 92.8%, in agreement with the previous data reported in literature.…”
Section: Osteoid Osteomamentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In addition, RFA proves to be a better tool in treating symptomatic recurrences after surgical resections (100% vs 90%). 30 Several authors have published articles [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] reporting a significant therapeutic success, confirming the effectiveness of RFA also in the long-term and on large series, showing that RFA is a safe method for treating OO with a low number of complications. Flanagin and Lindskog, 39 in their study, referred an efficacy of this technique equals 92.8%, in agreement with the previous data reported in literature.…”
Section: Osteoid Osteomamentioning
confidence: 80%
“…RFA is currently considered as the treatment of choice 16 . It is both safe and effi cient therapy, with a high average initial success rate of 92%, low recurrence (0-35%) and complication rates (3%) 17 . Th e most common complications are thermal damage to sensitive neurovascular structures localized in the probe vicinity and skin burns, and therefore, this method was not a suitable treatment option for our patient 16 .…”
Section: Discussion and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A great number of methods have been described in the treatment of OO including a wide spectrum ranging from seldom-used conservative approach with NSAIDs over minimally invasive percutaneous treatments (mechanical, chemical or thermal ablation) to open surgical methods (en bloc resections and curettage techniques) [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] . Th erapeutic approach merely depends on numerous factors, among which anatomical localization is one of the most important factors in decision-making.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intention was to treat every patient with a target temperature of 90°C for 6-8 min, depending on the size and location of the OO. For example, if the lesion was adherent to sensitive structures like spinal nerve roots or close to the skin, the target temperature was reduced ("low-energy ablation", e.g., 80°C for 8 min) [14] (Fig. 2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%