2010
DOI: 10.1089/end.2009.0199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiofrequency Ablation–Assisted Robotic Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Without Renal Hilar Vessel Clamping Versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: A Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes

Abstract: The use of RFA-assistance during robotic partial nephrectomy allows excision of renal tumors without hilar vascular clamping, thus eliminating renal warm ischemia. Larger and more centrally located tumors were excised with RF-RCPN. No differences in blood loss, complication rate, postoperative bleeding, renal function, or recurrence rate were noted compared with LPN.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of radiofrequency ablation is the most promising [24][25][26][27][28]. Wu et al [29] recently reported on the use of the Habib 4 £ RFA device to coagulate a margin of normal parenchyma around the renal mass to allow excision of the mass within a bloodless plane in 42 patients . The average size of the tumor treated was 2.8 cm and average EBL was 337 ml.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of radiofrequency ablation is the most promising [24][25][26][27][28]. Wu et al [29] recently reported on the use of the Habib 4 £ RFA device to coagulate a margin of normal parenchyma around the renal mass to allow excision of the mass within a bloodless plane in 42 patients . The average size of the tumor treated was 2.8 cm and average EBL was 337 ml.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We cannot directly compare studies using the RFC device with different methodologies, but there is some current progress of note in managing small renal masses, as summarized in Table 2. In a recently published study, Wu and associates 13 analyzed the use of Habib-assisted robot-assisted PN in 42 patients for tumors of similar nature and patients at similar risk of renal disease. 13 Mean OR time for this group of patients was 373 minutes, while Nadler and colleagues 12 reported a median OR time of 435 minutes with their robotic approach (although patient and tumor characteristics were not provided).…”
Section: Radiofrequency Coagulation-assisted Lpnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, it has been described in experimental porcine models 10 and OPN series, 11 but only a few reports exist describing the usefulness in LPN with a limited number of patients. 9,12,13 In this study, we retrospectively review a series of patients who underwent clampless LPN with RFC to study the safety and feasibility of this approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wu et al [68] have recently published a series comparing 36 patients undergoing LPN with hilar clamping to 42 patients undergoing RFA-assisted robotic clampless partial nephrectomy. Tumors were larger in the RFA group (2.8 vs. 2.0cm), more often endophytic (52.6% vs. 16.1%) and collecting system reconstruction occurred more often (78.6% vs. 30.6%).…”
Section: Radiofrequency Ablationmentioning
confidence: 99%