2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiocontrast Media Hypersensitivity: Skin Testing Differentiates Allergy From Nonallergic Reactions and Identifies a Safe Alternative as Proven by Intravenous Provocation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
1
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
50
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Iodine allergy is an exceptional cause of NIHR and can be excluded by patch test . Prophetic allergy testing in those without previous reaction (eg, “iodine allergy,” atopy) is not recommended .…”
Section: Skin Test Concentrations and Reading Time Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Iodine allergy is an exceptional cause of NIHR and can be excluded by patch test . Prophetic allergy testing in those without previous reaction (eg, “iodine allergy,” atopy) is not recommended .…”
Section: Skin Test Concentrations and Reading Time Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nearly all (96%) of severe reactions occur within 20 minutes. 8 Most commonly seen symptoms of IHRs to GBCM are urticaria (50%-90%) and nausea. 4 Anaphylaxis is rare, and the mortality rate is estimated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) at 8 in 100,000 doses GBCM administered.…”
Section: Clinical Findings In Ihrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In those cases, skin testing has been recommended. 8,42 Immediate-type hypersensitivity reactions to diagnostic dyes typically occur in a surgery setting. Thus, in most patients, various potential other elicitors of anaphylactic reactions, including latex, chlorhexidine, antibiotics, analgesics, and the dye, have been administered and should be included in the allergological workup.…”
Section: Indication For Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations