1959
DOI: 10.1038/1831582a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiocarbon Measurements on Samples of Known Age

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1961
1961
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, several other investigators used different tree-ring sequences to determine their sample ages. They at least qualitatively confirmed de Vries' results (Broecker, Olson & Bird, 1959;Willis, Tauber & Munnich, 1960;Ralph, 1959). As the cause of the 14C variations, these investigators considered changes in the 14C production rate through modulation of the cosmic ray flux by solar activity (see also Suess, 1958Suess, , 1968.…”
Section: The De Vries Variationssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…However, several other investigators used different tree-ring sequences to determine their sample ages. They at least qualitatively confirmed de Vries' results (Broecker, Olson & Bird, 1959;Willis, Tauber & Munnich, 1960;Ralph, 1959). As the cause of the 14C variations, these investigators considered changes in the 14C production rate through modulation of the cosmic ray flux by solar activity (see also Suess, 1958Suess, , 1968.…”
Section: The De Vries Variationssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Baxter and Walton (1971) reported an 30%° A14C variation from 1890-1950, and later, Baxter and Farmer (1973) reported a 10 to 20%° variation from 1829-1865, both with an 11-year periodicity, anti-correlated with sunspot numbers. But the A14C values in tree-ring samples from the same period measured by others (Broecker, Olson, and Bird, 1959;Cowan, Atluri, and Libby, 1965;Suess, 1965;Lerman, Mook, and Vogel, 1967;Damon, Long, and Wallick, 1973a;Tans, DeJong, and Mook, 1979;Burchuladze et al:, 1980;Stuiver andQuay, 1980, 1981) do not show any large amplitude fluctuations, although some of them also exhibit 11-year periodicity. Since Baxter and Walton used grains grown in Scotland at latitudes 54°N, higher than that of most other sample locations, the disagreement may be due to Department of Physics, University of Arizona, Tucson *Radiocarbon Laboratory, Archaeological Section, History Department, Peking University, Beijing, China Department of Physics, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China the difference in latitudes as well as in the time and duration of photosynthetic assimilation of CO2 by plants (Baxter and Farmer, 1973).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Radiocarbon dates began to indicate the possibility that an earlier correlation might be more accurate. Measurements published in 1951, 1955, and 1959(Kulp, Feely, and Tryon 1951Libby 1955;Broecker, Olson, and Bird 1959) appeared as strong support of the Spinden correlation (12.9.0.0.0). In October 1960 (Satterthwaite and Ralph 1960) however, an impressive analysis of a number of samples from Tikal by Elizabeth Ralph corrects the figures and indicates that probably the Goodman-Martinez-Thompson correlation is closest to the true value.…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%