1979
DOI: 10.1016/s0029-554x(79)96120-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiocarbon dating with a cyclotron

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 1976, following work with Luis Alvarez on a quark search using the LBL 88" cyclotron as a mass spectrometer, 2 Richard Muller realized that one could use a cyclotron for direct detection of trace isotope abundances for dating. 3 Tests at the 88" cyclotron 4 showed that it was possible to reject backgrounds with mass differences of 1%, by a factor of 10' 17 . However, when the cyclotron was tuned to accelerate 14 C, spurious background appeared, interfering with accurate carbon dating.…”
Section: Accelerator Mass Spectrometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1976, following work with Luis Alvarez on a quark search using the LBL 88" cyclotron as a mass spectrometer, 2 Richard Muller realized that one could use a cyclotron for direct detection of trace isotope abundances for dating. 3 Tests at the 88" cyclotron 4 showed that it was possible to reject backgrounds with mass differences of 1%, by a factor of 10' 17 . However, when the cyclotron was tuned to accelerate 14 C, spurious background appeared, interfering with accurate carbon dating.…”
Section: Accelerator Mass Spectrometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier work with positive ion AMS have typically been done with electron cyclotron resonance (ECR) sources (an alternative way to use ECR sources is to generate negative ions with charge exchange canal after the source [1]) and either with cyclotrons [2][3][4][5][6] or with heavy ion linear accelerators [4,[7][8][9][10][11]. Particular drawback with many of the earlier experiments have been the complexity of the experimental setup and scarcely available beam time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%