2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-6304-3_101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiocarbon Dating

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 for spatial coverage and table 1 for specific sampling locations). Charcoal is well known for producing reliable 14 C ages (Jull and Burr, 2015) and was the preferred target material for dating. Prior to analysis, PaleoResearch Institute in Golden, Colorado, identified a few aliquots of charcoal to genus level, but most were not identified (table 1).…”
Section: Radiocarbon Dating Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 for spatial coverage and table 1 for specific sampling locations). Charcoal is well known for producing reliable 14 C ages (Jull and Burr, 2015) and was the preferred target material for dating. Prior to analysis, PaleoResearch Institute in Golden, Colorado, identified a few aliquots of charcoal to genus level, but most were not identified (table 1).…”
Section: Radiocarbon Dating Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fortuitous presence of charcoal and shells in the deposits, and our methodology of dating only these materials, has resulted in an unusually clear chronologic framework that is presented in the composite stratigraphy in figure 5, the individual stratigraphic sections and annotated photographs in figures 7-19, and the age information presented in table 1. Bulk organic matter, humic acids, and aquatic gastropod shells are common in Las Vegas Formation deposits and could also have been used for dating, but doing so would have resulted in a less robust chronology because ages obtained from these materials are known to be affected by carbon mobility and transport, contamination, and hard-water effects (Trumbore, 2000;Jull and Burr, 2015). This rigorous approach has allowed us to differentiate ages at submillenial scales for individual beds within members D and E.…”
Section: The Las Vegas Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used radiocarbon ( 14 C) dating of charcoal (charred vascular plants), organic material, and small terrestrial gastropod shells of the Succineidae family establish age control for the deposits. Charcoal and organic material are recognized as suitable material for 14 C dating paleowetland deposits (Quade et al, 1998; Haynes, 2008; Jull and Burr, 2015) and were treated using the standard acid-base-acid (ABA) procedure. Previous work has shown the Succineidae shells also yield reliable 14 C ages regardless of the local habitat, environmental conditions, and geologic substrate (Pigati et al, 2010; 2013), including desert wetland ecosystems in the southwestern U.S. (Pigati et al, 2009, 2011; Springer et al, 2015, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%